The decision of the Privy Council earlier this year in Bahamas Oil Refining Company International Ltd v The Owners of the Cape Bari Tankschiffahrts GMBH & Co KG (“The Cape Bari”), allowing an appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas, provides clarification on whether a shipowner can waive its right to limit liability under the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (“Convention”) and on how a contract purporting to exclude the right to limit should be construed. The case represents the first consideration of this question under the Convention and since the 19th century by a final appellate court. Ultimately, the Privy Council confirmed that the Convention can be contracted out of, and that w...
The United States sold a steam tanker to S corporation and S delivered the vessel to T corporation f...
The quest for limited liability in business enterprises and transactions has been a driving force in...
REMOTENESS OF CONTRACTUAL DAMAGESOn 9 July 2008, the House of Lords handed down its decision in Tran...
At present, three international conventions (one of which has been modified by many signatory states...
The ability of vessel owners defending certain admiralty actions to limit their liability is the con...
The ability to limit liability to the after the occurrence value of a vessel responsible for a marit...
What are the procedural conditions for a shipowner or other entitled person to constitute a limitati...
Historical outline of the limitation of liability for maritime claims along with its application and...
The federal courts have often been faced with the “recurring and inherent conflict” between the Limi...
The purpose of this paper is to research the 1974 Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Pass...
This paper examines the relevance of limitation of liability in maritime claims in today’s business ...
In its 1994 decision, Ballard Shipping Co. v. Beach Shellfish, the United States Court of Appeals fo...
A bareboat charter is a contractual agreement akin to the lease of a vessel whereby most of the “cus...
The Shipowner\u27s Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 allowed the owner of a vessel to limit his li...
Part I of this Note examines the difference in respective emphasis placed by United States and Engli...
The United States sold a steam tanker to S corporation and S delivered the vessel to T corporation f...
The quest for limited liability in business enterprises and transactions has been a driving force in...
REMOTENESS OF CONTRACTUAL DAMAGESOn 9 July 2008, the House of Lords handed down its decision in Tran...
At present, three international conventions (one of which has been modified by many signatory states...
The ability of vessel owners defending certain admiralty actions to limit their liability is the con...
The ability to limit liability to the after the occurrence value of a vessel responsible for a marit...
What are the procedural conditions for a shipowner or other entitled person to constitute a limitati...
Historical outline of the limitation of liability for maritime claims along with its application and...
The federal courts have often been faced with the “recurring and inherent conflict” between the Limi...
The purpose of this paper is to research the 1974 Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Pass...
This paper examines the relevance of limitation of liability in maritime claims in today’s business ...
In its 1994 decision, Ballard Shipping Co. v. Beach Shellfish, the United States Court of Appeals fo...
A bareboat charter is a contractual agreement akin to the lease of a vessel whereby most of the “cus...
The Shipowner\u27s Limitation of Liability Act of 1851 allowed the owner of a vessel to limit his li...
Part I of this Note examines the difference in respective emphasis placed by United States and Engli...
The United States sold a steam tanker to S corporation and S delivered the vessel to T corporation f...
The quest for limited liability in business enterprises and transactions has been a driving force in...
REMOTENESS OF CONTRACTUAL DAMAGESOn 9 July 2008, the House of Lords handed down its decision in Tran...