This article discusses the death provisions in the New Zealand Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) and their application in the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Public Trust v Whyman. The author argues that the decision reveals the general uncertainty as to the overall purpose and scheme of the death provisions, which suggests the provisions are poorly drafted and in need of amendment. The article concludes that, whatever the outcome of Whyman, legal problems will remain unless there is clarification of the law
The issue variously termed “euthanasia”, “assisted suicide” or “aid in dying” repeatedly has been ra...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The recent decision of Seales v Attorney-General clarified the law surrounding voluntary euthanasia ...
This article considers the New Zealand High Court decision of Re Russell: Public Trust v Whyman, whi...
This article explains the concepts applying to property transfer on death under the New Zealand Prop...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
On death there is an inevitable tension in succession law between property and family, between testa...
This paper deals with the issue of recognising a property right in the human body after death. It ad...
In this article, the author reviews the first New Zealand Court of Appeal decision on the Property (...
Succession law in New Zealand has been widely criticised for many years as being incoherent and unpr...
This paper addresses how the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) may affect elderly people, part...
The proposition that a killer should not profit from the death of his or her victim started out as a...
This chapter provides a brief account of the history of family property law in New Zealand from the ...
This chapter explains when and how the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) applies to couples wh...
The issue variously termed “euthanasia”, “assisted suicide” or “aid in dying” repeatedly has been ra...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The recent decision of Seales v Attorney-General clarified the law surrounding voluntary euthanasia ...
This article considers the New Zealand High Court decision of Re Russell: Public Trust v Whyman, whi...
This article explains the concepts applying to property transfer on death under the New Zealand Prop...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
On death there is an inevitable tension in succession law between property and family, between testa...
This paper deals with the issue of recognising a property right in the human body after death. It ad...
In this article, the author reviews the first New Zealand Court of Appeal decision on the Property (...
Succession law in New Zealand has been widely criticised for many years as being incoherent and unpr...
This paper addresses how the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) may affect elderly people, part...
The proposition that a killer should not profit from the death of his or her victim started out as a...
This chapter provides a brief account of the history of family property law in New Zealand from the ...
This chapter explains when and how the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PRA) applies to couples wh...
The issue variously termed “euthanasia”, “assisted suicide” or “aid in dying” repeatedly has been ra...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The recent decision of Seales v Attorney-General clarified the law surrounding voluntary euthanasia ...