Add to ORKGIn this article, the author reviews the first New Zealand Court of Appeal decision on the Property (Relationships) Act 1976: Nation v Nation. The article concludes that this decision should be welcomed particularly by property lawyers, because it provides some much-needed certainty in regard to trusts as an asset protection mechanism and the Court’s powers to make orders in respect of dispositions to trusts
This paper addresses the lack of equality in relationship property appeals in the New Zealand Court ...
This article considers the New Zealand High Court decision of Re Russell: Public Trust v Whyman, whi...
Scott v Williams concerned s 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. In situations of significa...
In this article, the author reviews the first New Zealand Court of Appeal decision on the Property (...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The New Zealand Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001 signified a radical shift in New Zealand...
This article discusses the death provisions in the New Zealand Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PR...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
The author examines the New Zealand Court of Appeal’s reasoning in Holler v Osaki [2016] NZCA 130. T...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
This paper addresses the lack of equality in relationship property appeals in the New Zealand Court ...
This article considers the New Zealand High Court decision of Re Russell: Public Trust v Whyman, whi...
Scott v Williams concerned s 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. In situations of significa...
In this article, the author reviews the first New Zealand Court of Appeal decision on the Property (...
This article is an examination of the interaction between trusts and relationship property in New Ze...
This article considers the New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Clayton v Clayton, which concerne...
The Property (Relationships) Act 1976 is generally regarded as progressive and inclusive. The Act ap...
Trusts often have the effect of undermining the social aims of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976...
The New Zealand Property (Relationships) Amendment Act 2001 signified a radical shift in New Zealand...
This article discusses the death provisions in the New Zealand Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (PR...
In this article, Justice Hardie Boys explores a number of cases decided under the Matrimonial Proper...
This article asks how the conflict of laws should approach couples’ property as a matter of first pr...
The protective legislation which frequently resulted in assets held within a family trust being remo...
The author examines the New Zealand Court of Appeal’s reasoning in Holler v Osaki [2016] NZCA 130. T...
This article discusses the reasoning of the High Court and Court of Appeal in Harvey v Beveridge in ...
This paper addresses the lack of equality in relationship property appeals in the New Zealand Court ...
This article considers the New Zealand High Court decision of Re Russell: Public Trust v Whyman, whi...
Scott v Williams concerned s 15 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976. In situations of significa...