Sentiment and stance are two important concepts for the analysis of arguments. We propose to add another perspective to the analysis, namely moral sentiment. We argue that moral values are crucial for ideological debates and can thus add useful information for argument mining. In the paper, we present different models for automatically predicting moral sentiment in debates and evaluate them on a manually annotated testset. We then apply our models to investigate how moral values in arguments relate to argument quality, stance and audience reactions
Lakoff (2002 [1996], Moral politics. How liberals and conservative think. Chicago: The University of...
Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this questi...
Operationalizing morality is crucial for understanding multiple aspects of society that have moral v...
Sentiment and stance are two important concepts for the analysis of arguments. We propose to add ano...
An audience's prior beliefs and morals are strong indicators of how likely they will be affected by ...
Moral values influence people’s opinions and reasoning. While people increasingly share and shape ea...
This article introduces Justifications Analysis, a methodological approach for studying moral evalua...
Moral rhetoric plays a fundamental role in how we perceive and interpret the information we receive,...
International audienceMoral Inferences is the first volume to thoroughly explore the relationship be...
The theoretical framework for this research contrasting moral and factual reasoning was derived from...
International audienceThe role of reasoning in our moral lives has been increasingly called into que...
Moral intuitions are a central motivator in human behavior. Recent work highlights the importance of...
Moral values as commonsense norms shape our everyday individual and community behavior. The possibil...
Social media platforms have become an essential venue for online deliberation where users discuss ar...
My aim in this thesis is to examine two sources of plausibility for moral anti-realism. First, I add...
Lakoff (2002 [1996], Moral politics. How liberals and conservative think. Chicago: The University of...
Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this questi...
Operationalizing morality is crucial for understanding multiple aspects of society that have moral v...
Sentiment and stance are two important concepts for the analysis of arguments. We propose to add ano...
An audience's prior beliefs and morals are strong indicators of how likely they will be affected by ...
Moral values influence people’s opinions and reasoning. While people increasingly share and shape ea...
This article introduces Justifications Analysis, a methodological approach for studying moral evalua...
Moral rhetoric plays a fundamental role in how we perceive and interpret the information we receive,...
International audienceMoral Inferences is the first volume to thoroughly explore the relationship be...
The theoretical framework for this research contrasting moral and factual reasoning was derived from...
International audienceThe role of reasoning in our moral lives has been increasingly called into que...
Moral intuitions are a central motivator in human behavior. Recent work highlights the importance of...
Moral values as commonsense norms shape our everyday individual and community behavior. The possibil...
Social media platforms have become an essential venue for online deliberation where users discuss ar...
My aim in this thesis is to examine two sources of plausibility for moral anti-realism. First, I add...
Lakoff (2002 [1996], Moral politics. How liberals and conservative think. Chicago: The University of...
Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this questi...
Operationalizing morality is crucial for understanding multiple aspects of society that have moral v...