Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this question are often based on caricatures of reasoning, weak scientific evidence, and flawed interpretations of solid evidence. In support of optimism, we discuss three forms of moral reasoning (principle reasoning, consistency reasoning, and social proof) that can spur progressive changes in attitudes and behavior on a variety of issues, such as charitable giving, gay rights, and meat consumption. We conclude that moral reasoning, particularly when embedded in social networks with mutual trust and respect, is integral to moral progress
In this article we will demonstrate how cognitive psychological research on reasoning and decision m...
A new variety of empirical skeptical moral arguments have been put forward in recent years, drawing ...
Moral reasoning is as fallible as reasoning in any other cognitive domain, but we often behave as if...
Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this questi...
International audienceThe role of reasoning in our moral lives has been increasingly called into que...
Recent experiments in moral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to ...
May provides a compelling case that reasoning is central to moral psychology. In practice, many mora...
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments c...
This chapter discusses contemporary scientific research on the role of reason and emotion in moral j...
A moral judgment is the conclusion of a psychological process, and a moral belief is thecognitive co...
What is the best way to think about the relationship between Social Cognition and Moral Reasoning? P...
The theoretical framework for this research contrasting moral and factual reasoning was derived from...
According to Haidt's (2001) social intuitionist model (SIM), an individual's moral judgment normally...
In this article I examine the consequences of the dominance of intuitive thinking in moral judging a...
Evolutionary theorists since Darwin have viewed morality as a system designed for altruism. However,...
In this article we will demonstrate how cognitive psychological research on reasoning and decision m...
A new variety of empirical skeptical moral arguments have been put forward in recent years, drawing ...
Moral reasoning is as fallible as reasoning in any other cognitive domain, but we often behave as if...
Can reasoning improve moral judgments and lead to moral progress? Pessimistic answers to this questi...
International audienceThe role of reasoning in our moral lives has been increasingly called into que...
Recent experiments in moral psychology have been taken to imply that moral reasoning only serves to ...
May provides a compelling case that reasoning is central to moral psychology. In practice, many mora...
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments c...
This chapter discusses contemporary scientific research on the role of reason and emotion in moral j...
A moral judgment is the conclusion of a psychological process, and a moral belief is thecognitive co...
What is the best way to think about the relationship between Social Cognition and Moral Reasoning? P...
The theoretical framework for this research contrasting moral and factual reasoning was derived from...
According to Haidt's (2001) social intuitionist model (SIM), an individual's moral judgment normally...
In this article I examine the consequences of the dominance of intuitive thinking in moral judging a...
Evolutionary theorists since Darwin have viewed morality as a system designed for altruism. However,...
In this article we will demonstrate how cognitive psychological research on reasoning and decision m...
A new variety of empirical skeptical moral arguments have been put forward in recent years, drawing ...
Moral reasoning is as fallible as reasoning in any other cognitive domain, but we often behave as if...