Plaintiff- union brought an action under section 301 (a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act to compel arbitration of a grievance over the subcontracting of work by defendant-employer. The collective bargaining agreement provided that questions as to the proper interpretation or application of any of the provisions of the agreement would be submitted to arbitration and that all matters involving exclusively managerial functions were excluded from arbitration. The trial court held the grievance not arbitrable. On appeal, held, reversed. An implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings and the fact that some private arbitrators have held that the conventional recognition clause by implication prohibits unrestricted employer subcontractin...
In LMRA section 301(a) suits by individual employees, the courts have primarily focused upon the pre...
With the constant increase of employment litigation2 among individuals, unions and companies, the us...
Textile Workers Union of America (CIO) v. American Thread Co., 113 F. Supp. 137 (D. Mass. 1953)
Respondent company laid off a number of employees as a result of its decision to contract out mainte...
Under many collective bargaining contracts calling for arbitration of disputes, sooner or later a qu...
When an employer and a labor union negotiate over an employment contract, their agreements are usual...
A recent survey of collective bargaining agreements demonstrated that the parties to those agreement...
The purpose of this paper is to determine what, if any, particular criteria are currently being used...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
The general rule permitting pre-arbitration adjudication of arbitrability has been criticized as an ...
Plaintiff brought an action in the federal district court for Pennsylvania against the defendant lab...
An arbitrator, acting under a collective bargaining agreement which called for a speedy arbitration...
During the existence of a collective bargaining agreement which included both exclusive recognition ...
International Association of Machinists v. Cameron Iron Works, 257 F.2d 467 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. d...
One reflecting upon the legal nature of a collective bargaining agreement can hardly avoid beginning...
In LMRA section 301(a) suits by individual employees, the courts have primarily focused upon the pre...
With the constant increase of employment litigation2 among individuals, unions and companies, the us...
Textile Workers Union of America (CIO) v. American Thread Co., 113 F. Supp. 137 (D. Mass. 1953)
Respondent company laid off a number of employees as a result of its decision to contract out mainte...
Under many collective bargaining contracts calling for arbitration of disputes, sooner or later a qu...
When an employer and a labor union negotiate over an employment contract, their agreements are usual...
A recent survey of collective bargaining agreements demonstrated that the parties to those agreement...
The purpose of this paper is to determine what, if any, particular criteria are currently being used...
Plaintiff, an unincorporated labor organization, filed suit in federal district court to enforce a c...
The general rule permitting pre-arbitration adjudication of arbitrability has been criticized as an ...
Plaintiff brought an action in the federal district court for Pennsylvania against the defendant lab...
An arbitrator, acting under a collective bargaining agreement which called for a speedy arbitration...
During the existence of a collective bargaining agreement which included both exclusive recognition ...
International Association of Machinists v. Cameron Iron Works, 257 F.2d 467 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. d...
One reflecting upon the legal nature of a collective bargaining agreement can hardly avoid beginning...
In LMRA section 301(a) suits by individual employees, the courts have primarily focused upon the pre...
With the constant increase of employment litigation2 among individuals, unions and companies, the us...
Textile Workers Union of America (CIO) v. American Thread Co., 113 F. Supp. 137 (D. Mass. 1953)