Klein & Barron argue that insects are capable of subjective experience, i.e., sentience. Whereas we mostly agree with the conclusion of their arguments, we think there is an even more important message to be learned from their work. The line of reasoning opened by Klein & Barron proves instructive for how neuroscientists can and should explore the biological phenomenon of consciousness
There have been various attempts to apply Darwinian evolutionary theory to an understanding of the h...
We attribute consciousness to other humans because their anatomy and behavior resembles our own and ...
Cruse H, Schilling M. No proof for subjective experience in insects. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(9): 12...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
How, why, and when consciousness evolved remain hotly debated topics. Addressing these issues requir...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
To what degree are non-human animals conscious? We propose that the most meaningful way to approach ...
Klein & Barron’s (2016) (K & B’s) case for insect consciousness is a welcome development in an area ...
Klein & Barron (2016) propose that subjective experience in humans arises in the midbrain and then a...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron (2016) argue that insects have sentience because of functional similarities between t...
There have been various attempts to apply Darwinian evolutionary theory to an understanding of the h...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
There have been various attempts to apply Darwinian evolutionary theory to an understanding of the h...
We attribute consciousness to other humans because their anatomy and behavior resembles our own and ...
Cruse H, Schilling M. No proof for subjective experience in insects. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(9): 12...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
How, why, and when consciousness evolved remain hotly debated topics. Addressing these issues requir...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
To what degree are non-human animals conscious? We propose that the most meaningful way to approach ...
Klein & Barron’s (2016) (K & B’s) case for insect consciousness is a welcome development in an area ...
Klein & Barron (2016) propose that subjective experience in humans arises in the midbrain and then a...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron (2016) argue that insects have sentience because of functional similarities between t...
There have been various attempts to apply Darwinian evolutionary theory to an understanding of the h...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
There have been various attempts to apply Darwinian evolutionary theory to an understanding of the h...
We attribute consciousness to other humans because their anatomy and behavior resembles our own and ...
Cruse H, Schilling M. No proof for subjective experience in insects. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(9): 12...