Klein & Barron (2016) propose that subjective experience in humans arises in the midbrain and then argue that insects have the capacity for subjective experience because their nervous system can perform neural processing similar to that of the midbrain. This approach ultimately fails because it is built on the false premise that the midbrain is the source of the awareness of sensory stimuli. I instead propose that the capacity for subjective experience must be based on fundamental neural computations that generate the “what it feels like” experience. Two such computations associated with metarepresentations and high level representations entering working memory are discussed as possible measures of the capacity for subjective experience
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue for considering the welfare of invertebrates, especially insects, ...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...
To what degree are non-human animals conscious? We propose that the most meaningful way to approach ...
How, why, and when consciousness evolved remain hotly debated topics. Addressing these issues requir...
Whether insects have the potential for subjective experiences depends on the definition of subjectiv...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
Cruse H, Schilling M. No proof for subjective experience in insects. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(9): 12...
Klein & Barron argue that insects are capable of subjective experience, i.e., sentience. Whereas we ...
Klein & Barron (2016) argue that insects have sentience because of functional similarities between t...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
We attribute consciousness to other humans because their anatomy and behavior resembles our own and ...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue for considering the welfare of invertebrates, especially insects, ...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...
To what degree are non-human animals conscious? We propose that the most meaningful way to approach ...
How, why, and when consciousness evolved remain hotly debated topics. Addressing these issues requir...
Whether insects have the potential for subjective experiences depends on the definition of subjectiv...
Our target article, "Insects have the capacity for subjective experience," has provoked a diverse ra...
Our target article, “Insects have the capacity for subjective experience,” has provoked a diverse ra...
Klein & Barron’s (K & B’s) suggestion that insects have the capacity for phenomenal consciousness is...
In arguing that insect brains are capable of sentience, Klein & Barron rely heavily on Bjorn Merker’...
Cruse H, Schilling M. No proof for subjective experience in insects. Animal Sentience. 2016;1(9): 12...
Klein & Barron argue that insects are capable of subjective experience, i.e., sentience. Whereas we ...
Klein & Barron (2016) argue that insects have sentience because of functional similarities between t...
Although we are mostly supportive, we point out the strengths and weaknesses of Klein & Barron’s (20...
We attribute consciousness to other humans because their anatomy and behavior resembles our own and ...
Klein & Barron\u27s review of recent insect neurobiology helps correct the impression that insect be...
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue for considering the welfare of invertebrates, especially insects, ...
In common with most other authors, Mikhalevich & Powell assume that phenomenal consciousness is a “p...