Rowlands argues that animals have implicit pre-reflective awareness and that this is adequate to create the unity of conscious thought required for personhood. For him pre-reflective awareness does not include intentionality and is probably an unconscious process. I suggest that his sense of implicit leads to significant difficulties for his argument and that including intentionality in the definition of a first-person perspective provides a stronger base for viewing animals as persons
Rowlands (2016) presents a compelling argument for extending personhood to nonhuman animals. Sociolo...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...
Rowlands argues that animals have implicit pre-reflective awareness and that this is adequate to cre...
Rowlands argues that many nonhuman animals are “persons,” contrary to the prevailing orthodoxy which...
Mark Rowlands holds that creatures endowed with pre-reflective awareness may qualify as persons: In ...
I argue that Rowlands’s concept of pre-reflective self-awareness offers a way to understand animals ...
Mark Rowlands’s (2016) target article invites us to consider individuals in a broad subset of the no...
According to Rowlands, personhood in nonhuman animals calls for a unified mental life and pre-reflec...
Rowlands offers a de-intellectualised account of personhood that is meant to secure the unity of a m...
Rowlands applies the two organizing ideas of the Lockean concept of personhood — mental life and uni...
Rowlands’s case for attributing personhood to lower animals is ultimately convincing, but along the ...
Rowlands’s case for attributing personhood to lower animals is ultimately convincing, but along the ...
Rowlands (2016) concentrates strictly on the metaphysical concept of person, but his notion of anima...
The main aim of this paper is to highlight the need to address the conceptual problem of “implicit k...
Rowlands (2016) presents a compelling argument for extending personhood to nonhuman animals. Sociolo...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...
Rowlands argues that animals have implicit pre-reflective awareness and that this is adequate to cre...
Rowlands argues that many nonhuman animals are “persons,” contrary to the prevailing orthodoxy which...
Mark Rowlands holds that creatures endowed with pre-reflective awareness may qualify as persons: In ...
I argue that Rowlands’s concept of pre-reflective self-awareness offers a way to understand animals ...
Mark Rowlands’s (2016) target article invites us to consider individuals in a broad subset of the no...
According to Rowlands, personhood in nonhuman animals calls for a unified mental life and pre-reflec...
Rowlands offers a de-intellectualised account of personhood that is meant to secure the unity of a m...
Rowlands applies the two organizing ideas of the Lockean concept of personhood — mental life and uni...
Rowlands’s case for attributing personhood to lower animals is ultimately convincing, but along the ...
Rowlands’s case for attributing personhood to lower animals is ultimately convincing, but along the ...
Rowlands (2016) concentrates strictly on the metaphysical concept of person, but his notion of anima...
The main aim of this paper is to highlight the need to address the conceptual problem of “implicit k...
Rowlands (2016) presents a compelling argument for extending personhood to nonhuman animals. Sociolo...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...
That great apes are the only primates to recognise their reflections is often taken to show that the...