The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This paper explains the judgment, and the background to it. It also considers the implications of the judgment for future exercises of the prerogative power, and the policy debate on reforming this area of UK constitutional law.<br
Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situatio...
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful...
This paper questions the continued existence of prerogative as a meaningful juridical category withi...
The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This pape...
The British government yesterday secured a prorogation of Parliament from the Queen. Parliament will...
This article considers the recent prorogation litigation, which is encompassed of two legal actions,...
In this new paper for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Professor Martin Loughlin of the LSE...
The UK Supreme Court is about to decide the fate of the UK Government’s decision to prorogue Parliam...
On 24 September 2019, just two weeks after Parliament had been controversially prorogued by Prime Mi...
Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and...
Tomorrow, on Tuesday 17 September, the UK Supreme Court will be asked to consider appeals from the C...
The UK Supreme Court decision that proroguing parliament was unlawful may not be as meaningful as it...
In R (Miller) v Prime Minister (No. 2) the UKSC invalidated an attempted prorogation of Parliament, ...
There are 15 weeks left until the UK’s scheduled departure from the EU. A new leader of the Conserv...
Resumen: La prorogation del Parlamento del Reino Unido: ¿es una cuestión política o una medida susc...
Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situatio...
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful...
This paper questions the continued existence of prerogative as a meaningful juridical category withi...
The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This pape...
The British government yesterday secured a prorogation of Parliament from the Queen. Parliament will...
This article considers the recent prorogation litigation, which is encompassed of two legal actions,...
In this new paper for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Professor Martin Loughlin of the LSE...
The UK Supreme Court is about to decide the fate of the UK Government’s decision to prorogue Parliam...
On 24 September 2019, just two weeks after Parliament had been controversially prorogued by Prime Mi...
Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and...
Tomorrow, on Tuesday 17 September, the UK Supreme Court will be asked to consider appeals from the C...
The UK Supreme Court decision that proroguing parliament was unlawful may not be as meaningful as it...
In R (Miller) v Prime Minister (No. 2) the UKSC invalidated an attempted prorogation of Parliament, ...
There are 15 weeks left until the UK’s scheduled departure from the EU. A new leader of the Conserv...
Resumen: La prorogation del Parlamento del Reino Unido: ¿es una cuestión política o una medida susc...
Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situatio...
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful...
This paper questions the continued existence of prerogative as a meaningful juridical category withi...
.svg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG