The enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No 2) 2005 (Cth), in particular ' its preventative detention and control order regimes, I can be seen as significantl y transforming traditional common law assumptions in Australia about the liberty of the individual "save in circumstances of arrest on reasonable suspicion of the commission of an offence . Representing a shift to principles of pre-emption and interdiction, preventative detention and control order provisions under the legislation have the potent ial of promoting over time, fundamental and exponential changes to the qualities of the democratic relationship between the cit izen and State
Contemporary British anti-terror legislation has been characterised by an extensive use of extra-ord...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
[Extract] The government moved rapidly to create a range of new terrorist offences and to outlaw org...
The enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No 2) 2005 (Cth), in particular ' its preventative detenti...
Federal laws passed since the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States represent an extraordin...
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Australian government embarked on an anti...
Whether forms of detention introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament are valid in light of the power...
The Australian government’s Anti-Terrorism Bill (No 2) 2005 authorised the Australian Federal Police...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
This article examines whether prevention in anti‐terror law is distinct from prevention in other are...
The extensively amended Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrori...
This chapter considers the role that proven effectiveness may play in guiding the evolution of a pre...
This thesis examines the way the Australian Federal Parliament approached the task of enacting count...
In the years since 9/11 counter-terrorism law and policy has proliferated across the world. This boo...
During 2002, on the pretext of shielding the Australian people from terrorism, the Howard government...
Contemporary British anti-terror legislation has been characterised by an extensive use of extra-ord...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
[Extract] The government moved rapidly to create a range of new terrorist offences and to outlaw org...
The enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No 2) 2005 (Cth), in particular ' its preventative detenti...
Federal laws passed since the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States represent an extraordin...
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Australian government embarked on an anti...
Whether forms of detention introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament are valid in light of the power...
The Australian government’s Anti-Terrorism Bill (No 2) 2005 authorised the Australian Federal Police...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
This article examines whether prevention in anti‐terror law is distinct from prevention in other are...
The extensively amended Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrori...
This chapter considers the role that proven effectiveness may play in guiding the evolution of a pre...
This thesis examines the way the Australian Federal Parliament approached the task of enacting count...
In the years since 9/11 counter-terrorism law and policy has proliferated across the world. This boo...
During 2002, on the pretext of shielding the Australian people from terrorism, the Howard government...
Contemporary British anti-terror legislation has been characterised by an extensive use of extra-ord...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
[Extract] The government moved rapidly to create a range of new terrorist offences and to outlaw org...