The Australian government’s Anti-Terrorism Bill (No 2) 2005 authorised the Australian Federal Police to use control orders and preventative detention in dealing with suspected terrorist threats. Although Australia had experience with preventative detention and control orders during both world wars, this historical perspective did not figure in debate over the legislation. Klaus Neumann examines the historical precedents and looks at the very different debate in the United States
In this paper for the 2007 Australasian Political Science Association conference, Daniel Baldino arg...
This article examines key provisions of Australia's antiterrorism legislation introduced in the afte...
Since 2001 expenditure on the security services has increased exponentially in Western democracies a...
On December 7, the Australian parliament passed the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005. According to A...
This paper investigates the role that Australia is playing in the international transfer or diffusio...
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Australian government embarked on an anti...
The enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No 2) 2005 (Cth), in particular ' its preventative detenti...
This article examines whether prevention in anti‐terror law is distinct from prevention in other are...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
This thesis examines the way the Australian Federal Parliament approached the task of enacting count...
Until September 11, Australia had no national laws on terrorism. Political violence was dealt with b...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
The Australian legal definition of terrorism and a brief history of terrorism in Australia set the c...
Ben Saul assesses the federal government’s proposed counter-terrorism laws. THE July bombings in Lo...
Federal laws passed since the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States represent an extraordin...
In this paper for the 2007 Australasian Political Science Association conference, Daniel Baldino arg...
This article examines key provisions of Australia's antiterrorism legislation introduced in the afte...
Since 2001 expenditure on the security services has increased exponentially in Western democracies a...
On December 7, the Australian parliament passed the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005. According to A...
This paper investigates the role that Australia is playing in the international transfer or diffusio...
Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Australian government embarked on an anti...
The enactment of the Anti-Terrorism Act (No 2) 2005 (Cth), in particular ' its preventative detenti...
This article examines whether prevention in anti‐terror law is distinct from prevention in other are...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
This thesis examines the way the Australian Federal Parliament approached the task of enacting count...
Until September 11, Australia had no national laws on terrorism. Political violence was dealt with b...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
The Australian legal definition of terrorism and a brief history of terrorism in Australia set the c...
Ben Saul assesses the federal government’s proposed counter-terrorism laws. THE July bombings in Lo...
Federal laws passed since the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States represent an extraordin...
In this paper for the 2007 Australasian Political Science Association conference, Daniel Baldino arg...
This article examines key provisions of Australia's antiterrorism legislation introduced in the afte...
Since 2001 expenditure on the security services has increased exponentially in Western democracies a...