This Article examines whether sexual orientation discrimination claims are a form of sex-plus discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of “sex.” Until very recently, every United States Court of Appeals to have interpreted Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination had determined that it does not encompass claims on the basis of sexual orientation. Times, and judicial interpretations, are changing. In April 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned decades of precedent by holding that sexual orientation discrimination claims are indeed encompassed within Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination, a ruling adopted onl...
This article is set forth in five parts. Part II is largely descriptive and focuses on two aspects o...
In this article, Kenny Bohannon discusses whether the Eighth Circuit in the case of Horton v. Midwes...
Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Altitude Express v. Zarda, a case t...
This Article examines the efficacy of the most recently proposed version of the Employment Non-Discr...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
Many Americans currently believe that federal law prohibits discrimination because of sexual orienta...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Baldwin v. Foxx opined—for the first time—that employ...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
Since 2006, the Illinois Human Rights Act has prohibited discrimination in employment because of an ...
This article is set forth in five parts. Part II is largely descriptive and focuses on two aspects o...
In this article, Kenny Bohannon discusses whether the Eighth Circuit in the case of Horton v. Midwes...
Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
The United States Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Altitude Express v. Zarda, a case t...
This Article examines the efficacy of the most recently proposed version of the Employment Non-Discr...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
Many Americans currently believe that federal law prohibits discrimination because of sexual orienta...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Baldwin v. Foxx opined—for the first time—that employ...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
Since 2006, the Illinois Human Rights Act has prohibited discrimination in employment because of an ...
This article is set forth in five parts. Part II is largely descriptive and focuses on two aspects o...
In this article, Kenny Bohannon discusses whether the Eighth Circuit in the case of Horton v. Midwes...
Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “...