Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “sex” includes sexual orientation and gender identity, expanding employers’ potential liability. This is based in part on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) firm position that both sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under the statute
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination and haras...
Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Seventh Circuit have taken the position t...
Many Americans currently believe that federal law prohibits discrimination because of sexual orienta...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Seventh Circuit have taken the position t...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
This Article examines whether sexual orientation discrimination claims are a form of sex-plus discri...
This Article examines the efficacy of the most recently proposed version of the Employment Non-Discr...
This Chapter will address the current protections that are available to lesbian, gay, bisexual and t...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination and haras...
Plaintiffs and their attorneys have an increasingly viable argument that Title VII’s definition of “...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Seventh Circuit have taken the position t...
Many Americans currently believe that federal law prohibits discrimination because of sexual orienta...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Seventh Circuit have taken the position t...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
This Article examines whether sexual orientation discrimination claims are a form of sex-plus discri...
This Article examines the efficacy of the most recently proposed version of the Employment Non-Discr...
This Chapter will address the current protections that are available to lesbian, gay, bisexual and t...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination and haras...
Add to ORKG