The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because the law makes them so has long puzzled theorists. This essay argues that the distinction, while getting at something real, is based on a mistake. That mistake is made both by those who see moral wrongness as a necessary condition for criminality and by those who believe merely making something illegal is sufficient to make it criminal. Neither is correct. Rather, what makes something a criminal wrong is that it involves a violation of a law that has been justified in terms of “public reason.
This article makes six points. First, under any plausible normative perspective, the distinction bet...
An important task for any community is to find a source of principled limits on the criminal law. Th...
The criminal law maxim ignorance of the law is no excuse represents a broad doctrine of strict lia...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of 'public wrongs' in the longstanding idea th...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
The goal of this article is to rethink the relationship between the concepts of justification and wr...
This article makes six points. First, under any plausible normative perspective, the distinction bet...
An important task for any community is to find a source of principled limits on the criminal law. Th...
The criminal law maxim ignorance of the law is no excuse represents a broad doctrine of strict lia...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of 'public wrongs' in the longstanding idea th...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
The goal of this article is to rethink the relationship between the concepts of justification and wr...
This article makes six points. First, under any plausible normative perspective, the distinction bet...
An important task for any community is to find a source of principled limits on the criminal law. Th...
The criminal law maxim ignorance of the law is no excuse represents a broad doctrine of strict lia...