This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea that crimes are public wrongs. By contrasting criminal law with the civil laws of torts and contracts, it argues that ‘public wrongs’ should not be understood merely as wrongs that properly concern the public, but more specifically as those which the state, as the public, ought to punish. It then briefly considers the implications that this has on criminalization.AHRC (AH/H015655/1
Blackstone had a point in identifying crimes as public wrongs and torts as private wrongs. Both crim...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This essay provides an overview of the crime/tort distinction. It first investigates some of the fun...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of 'public wrongs' in the longstanding idea th...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
R.A. Duff’s The Realm of the Criminal Law advances the literature on criminalization by providing th...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
It is sometimes said that tort law provides for the vindication of individual rights — which r...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
Blackstone had a point in identifying crimes as public wrongs and torts as private wrongs. Both crim...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This essay provides an overview of the crime/tort distinction. It first investigates some of the fun...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of 'public wrongs' in the longstanding idea th...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
R.A. Duff’s The Realm of the Criminal Law advances the literature on criminalization by providing th...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
It is sometimes said that tort law provides for the vindication of individual rights — which r...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
Blackstone had a point in identifying crimes as public wrongs and torts as private wrongs. Both crim...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This essay provides an overview of the crime/tort distinction. It first investigates some of the fun...