This paper is about how best to understand the notion of 'public wrongs' in the longstanding idea that crimes are public wrongs. By contrasting criminal law with the civil laws of torts and contracts, it argues that 'public wrongs' should not be understood merely as wrongs that properly concern the public, but more specifically as those which the state, as the public, ought to punish. It then briefly considers the implications that this has on criminalization. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Criminal law is extending its boundaries to capture conduct that was previously described as civil o...
"When should we make use of the criminal law? Suppose that a responsible legislature seeks to enact ...
In this paper, the author theoretically deals with traditional notions of civil law in a new light, ...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
Some academics from the Wolff school and Jakobs school in present-day Germany attempt to reconstruct...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
This chapter focuses on the concepts of wrong and wrongdoing, rather than on the concept of harm. Bu...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
Criminal law is extending its boundaries to capture conduct that was previously described as civil o...
"When should we make use of the criminal law? Suppose that a responsible legislature seeks to enact ...
In this paper, the author theoretically deals with traditional notions of civil law in a new light, ...
This paper is about how best to understand the notion of ‘public wrongs’ in the longstanding idea th...
There are a set of wrongs that are normatively distinct as ‘criminal wrongs’, and yet, there is disa...
Despite the notion's prominence, scholarship has yet to offer a viable account of the view that crim...
The distinction between crimes that involve wrongs in themselves and crimes that are wrong because t...
It is often claimed that the fact that some wrongs are public is a fact that is important to our thi...
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory i...
Some academics from the Wolff school and Jakobs school in present-day Germany attempt to reconstruct...
This article presents a philosophical account of the nature of crime. It argues that the criminal la...
The Criminalization series arose from an interdisciplinary investigation into criminalization, focus...
This is a response to five critiques of my 2018 book The Realm of Criminal Law, by Michelle Dempsey,...
This chapter focuses on the concepts of wrong and wrongdoing, rather than on the concept of harm. Bu...
It is a bizarre state of affairs that criminal law has no coherent description or explanation. We ha...
Criminal law is extending its boundaries to capture conduct that was previously described as civil o...
"When should we make use of the criminal law? Suppose that a responsible legislature seeks to enact ...
In this paper, the author theoretically deals with traditional notions of civil law in a new light, ...