Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a local court rule preventing a witness who had not testified at an arbitration hearing from testifying in a subsequent trial on appeal contravened the express mandate of the Arbitration Act that all appeals should be de novo and thus exceeded the rulemaking authority of the common pleas courts. Weber v. Lynch, 375 A.2d 1278 (Pa. 1977)
The law did not look kindly on arbitration in its infancy. As a process by which two or more parties...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering...
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court compelling an estate\u27s claims to ar...
S. M. Wolff Co. v. Tulkoff, 9 N.Y.2d 356, 214 N.Y.S.2d 374 (1961), reversing 11 A.D.2d 656, 203 N.Y....
A review of the Pennsylvania decisions relating to arbitration under the arbitration statute of 1927...
This Note addresses a recent Alabama Supreme Court decision concerning the issue of contracted appel...
As indicated in detail in the main text of this article the new Pennsylvania Arbitration Statute is ...
Some circuits have also taken the position that when a court rules on an arbitration order in an emb...
Matter of Publishers\u27 Assn. (Newspaper Union), 280 App. Div. 500, 114 N. Y. S. 2d 401 (1st Dep\u2...
Defendant contracted with plaintiff to grade an athletic field. The contract required all questions ...
With the increase of mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer contracts, private arbitration fir...
Judge Stiglich issued the opinion. The issue was of first impression and asked if under NRCP 60(b) a...
This Note will examine the decision in In re Fellman,4 where the Superior Court of Pennsylvania dete...
In Rolon v. Henneman, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether absolute immunity shoul...
The enactment of § 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) afforded courts with specific guidelines ...
The law did not look kindly on arbitration in its infancy. As a process by which two or more parties...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering...
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court compelling an estate\u27s claims to ar...
S. M. Wolff Co. v. Tulkoff, 9 N.Y.2d 356, 214 N.Y.S.2d 374 (1961), reversing 11 A.D.2d 656, 203 N.Y....
A review of the Pennsylvania decisions relating to arbitration under the arbitration statute of 1927...
This Note addresses a recent Alabama Supreme Court decision concerning the issue of contracted appel...
As indicated in detail in the main text of this article the new Pennsylvania Arbitration Statute is ...
Some circuits have also taken the position that when a court rules on an arbitration order in an emb...
Matter of Publishers\u27 Assn. (Newspaper Union), 280 App. Div. 500, 114 N. Y. S. 2d 401 (1st Dep\u2...
Defendant contracted with plaintiff to grade an athletic field. The contract required all questions ...
With the increase of mandatory arbitration agreements in consumer contracts, private arbitration fir...
Judge Stiglich issued the opinion. The issue was of first impression and asked if under NRCP 60(b) a...
This Note will examine the decision in In re Fellman,4 where the Superior Court of Pennsylvania dete...
In Rolon v. Henneman, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals considered whether absolute immunity shoul...
The enactment of § 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) afforded courts with specific guidelines ...
The law did not look kindly on arbitration in its infancy. As a process by which two or more parties...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering...
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court compelling an estate\u27s claims to ar...