Add to ORKGThe Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a jury\u27s failure to award damages for pain and suffering in a personal injury action where the evidence concerning the plaintiffs injuries is uncontested and the injuries are of the type that common sense dictates involve pain and suffering is shocking to a court\u27s conscience and therefore a new trial is appropriate. Neison v. Hines, 653 A.2d 634 (Pa. 1995)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a cause of action exists for mental distress resulting ...
There is no mystery in the language which courts from time immemorial expressed in an attempt to exp...
I. Pain and Suffering … A. Past Pain and Suffering … B. Future Pain and Suffering … C. Mental Suffer...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
A study analyzed the civil jury system and the difference in personal injury awards between automobi...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a local court rule preventing a witness who had not tes...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
Plaintiff alleged that defendant used vile and abusive language toward her on a public street; that ...
P sought recovery for injuries arising out of an automobile accident. During trial P introduced thre...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
Many jurisdictions award pain and suffering damages, yet it is difficult for judges or juries to qua...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a cause of action exists for mental distress resulting ...
There is no mystery in the language which courts from time immemorial expressed in an attempt to exp...
I. Pain and Suffering … A. Past Pain and Suffering … B. Future Pain and Suffering … C. Mental Suffer...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) allows trial courts to grant new trials to any or all of the p...
A study analyzed the civil jury system and the difference in personal injury awards between automobi...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a local court rule preventing a witness who had not tes...
P sued D for malpractice. After a verdict for P, the trial court granted D\u27s motion for new trial...
I. Introduction II. History … A. In General … B. Waiver III. Nominal Verdicts vs. Substantial though...
The California Court of Appeals has held that a cause of action may be maintained in strict liabilit...
Plaintiff alleged that defendant used vile and abusive language toward her on a public street; that ...
P sought recovery for injuries arising out of an automobile accident. During trial P introduced thre...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the lessor of a truck is not liable to lessee\u27s passenge...
Many jurisdictions award pain and suffering damages, yet it is difficult for judges or juries to qua...
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages arising from personal injuries claimed to have been suff...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a cause of action exists for mental distress resulting ...
There is no mystery in the language which courts from time immemorial expressed in an attempt to exp...
I. Pain and Suffering … A. Past Pain and Suffering … B. Future Pain and Suffering … C. Mental Suffer...