The National Labor Relations Act does not specifically prohibit an employer from temporarily locking out his employees during collective bargaining negotiations. For many years, nevertheless, only lockouts used solely to avoid substantial economic loss as a result of union action-so-called defensive lockouts-were allowed. However, the emphasis which Congress placed on equality of bargaining pressure in enacting the Taft-Hartley amendments to the NLRA has caused a change in this judicial attitude. Although a few courts have gone so far as to suggest that the lockout should be as freely available as the strike, the United States Supreme Court has been more cautious in defining the legal limits of the lockout. In fact, prior to its decision ...
Recent NLRB decisions have permitted union members to resign from a union and return to work without...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently extended the limits within which an employer might lock ...
The National Labor Relations Act does not specifically prohibit an employer from temporarily locking...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to offset employers’ superior power in coll...
One of the employer\u27s traditional weapons against the economic power of unions is the lockout. Si...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act guarantees freedom from employment discrimination based on ra...
During an organizational campaign the employer prohibited any dissemination of literature on company...
The day before a representation election was to be held at respondents plant the employees were asse...
The Supreme Court has held that a ruling by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Boar...
The United States Supreme Court held that while the National Labor Relations Board does have power u...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
Large numbers of employers in this country, particularly small businesses, are members of multiemplo...
When contract negotiations between an employer, a Charlotte, North Carolina TV station, and a local ...
Recent NLRB decisions have permitted union members to resign from a union and return to work without...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently extended the limits within which an employer might lock ...
The National Labor Relations Act does not specifically prohibit an employer from temporarily locking...
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to offset employers’ superior power in coll...
One of the employer\u27s traditional weapons against the economic power of unions is the lockout. Si...
A union picketed interstate motor carriers to induce non-union clerical employees to join the union,...
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act guarantees freedom from employment discrimination based on ra...
During an organizational campaign the employer prohibited any dissemination of literature on company...
The day before a representation election was to be held at respondents plant the employees were asse...
The Supreme Court has held that a ruling by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Boar...
The United States Supreme Court held that while the National Labor Relations Board does have power u...
The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and union contained a no-strike provision. ...
Large numbers of employers in this country, particularly small businesses, are members of multiemplo...
When contract negotiations between an employer, a Charlotte, North Carolina TV station, and a local ...
Recent NLRB decisions have permitted union members to resign from a union and return to work without...
In the spring of 1937 the respondent distributed anti-union literature to its employees. Some of the...
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently extended the limits within which an employer might lock ...