This Article seeks to offer a novel explanation of what affects control contestability in Continental Europe's listed firms, highlighting the powerful anti-takeover role played by supermajority in companies controlled by minority blockholders. The Article shows how the requirement of a supermajority at the shareholder meeting, coupled with the unavailability of large-scale squeeze-out rights and the substantial ineffectiveness of pro-takeover provisions such as the board-neutrality rule and the breakthrough rule, hinders hostile takeovers and secures blockholder control in those companies. It further argues that such an outcome is fundamentally misguided and advances some reform proposals aimed at increasing control contestability in minor...
This paper analyses takeovers of companies owned by atomistic shareholders and by one minority block...
Posttakeover moral hazard by the acquirer and free‐riding by the target shareholders lead the former...
cahier de recherche n° 2010-10 E2This paper examines the incentives of controlling shareholders in t...
This Article seeks to offer a novel explanation of what affects control contestability in Continenta...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
According to Aesop, even the most effective fraud can turn against its perpetrator, and justice be d...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
In the article I analyse the more contentious part of the Directive, which provides for an extensive...
In the article authors analyze the control threshold set by the Croatian Takeover Act, which trigger...
This Article analyzes the allocation of the power to decide on hostile takeovers as between director...
We construct a dynamic takeover law index using hand-collected data on legal provisions and empirica...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
This paper analyses takeovers of companies owned by atomistic shareholders and by one minority block...
Posttakeover moral hazard by the acquirer and free‐riding by the target shareholders lead the former...
cahier de recherche n° 2010-10 E2This paper examines the incentives of controlling shareholders in t...
This Article seeks to offer a novel explanation of what affects control contestability in Continenta...
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeat...
According to Aesop, even the most effective fraud can turn against its perpetrator, and justice be d...
This paper argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutra...
The chapter argues that in revising the Takeover Bid Directive, EU policymakers should adopt a neutr...
In the article I analyse the more contentious part of the Directive, which provides for an extensive...
In the article authors analyze the control threshold set by the Croatian Takeover Act, which trigger...
This Article analyzes the allocation of the power to decide on hostile takeovers as between director...
We construct a dynamic takeover law index using hand-collected data on legal provisions and empirica...
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual compan...
This paper analyses takeovers of companies owned by atomistic shareholders and by one minority block...
Posttakeover moral hazard by the acquirer and free‐riding by the target shareholders lead the former...
cahier de recherche n° 2010-10 E2This paper examines the incentives of controlling shareholders in t...