Add to ORKGLet us start our discussion by indicating a frame of reference for the comments we wish to give about civil rights. Our discussion will relate primarily to patients, who have been hospitalized for the observation and treatment of mental illness. It is also based on the statutes in Ohio and on the practice in the courts and more especially in the receiving hospitals and state hospitals in Ohio. The receiving hospitals admit a high percentage of voluntary patients, whereas the state hospitals admit patients who have been committed
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation re...
The moral right of mental patients to adequate care and treatment has long been recognized in our so...
The issues surrounding the legal responsibility of caring for and maintaining a person with a mental...
Let us start our discussion by indicating a frame of reference for the comments we wish to give abou...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
One aspect of the court order that tends to produce fear in the hearts and minds of administrators e...
Commitment to a mental institution by itself does not, in all states, suspend civil rights. The cour...
The author discusses the court decisions re-volving around the right to treatment that have culminat...
The purpose of this comment is to highlight the new procedural and substantive rights that are now g...
This Note provides an overview of California\u27s mental health care system. It discusses the histor...
This paper discusses the use of court-imposed standards for public mental hospitals as a method of i...
In 1963, under President John F. Kennedy, federal legislation was passed toward developing new metho...
For all too many years, few people gave much thought to the civil rights of hospitalized mental pati...
This Note is an examination of mentally illinmates\u27 constitutional right to treatment. It has sig...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation re...
The moral right of mental patients to adequate care and treatment has long been recognized in our so...
The issues surrounding the legal responsibility of caring for and maintaining a person with a mental...
Let us start our discussion by indicating a frame of reference for the comments we wish to give abou...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
One aspect of the court order that tends to produce fear in the hearts and minds of administrators e...
Commitment to a mental institution by itself does not, in all states, suspend civil rights. The cour...
The author discusses the court decisions re-volving around the right to treatment that have culminat...
The purpose of this comment is to highlight the new procedural and substantive rights that are now g...
This Note provides an overview of California\u27s mental health care system. It discusses the histor...
This paper discusses the use of court-imposed standards for public mental hospitals as a method of i...
In 1963, under President John F. Kennedy, federal legislation was passed toward developing new metho...
For all too many years, few people gave much thought to the civil rights of hospitalized mental pati...
This Note is an examination of mentally illinmates\u27 constitutional right to treatment. It has sig...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation re...
The moral right of mental patients to adequate care and treatment has long been recognized in our so...
The issues surrounding the legal responsibility of caring for and maintaining a person with a mental...