This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation regarding the admission of a patient to a psychiatric hospital without their consent. In relation to the circumstances found in the case, conditions determining the acceptability of admission to a psychiatric hospital with no consent were discussed under legal regulations contained in art. 23 and 24 of the mental health act. The publication presented arguments for the rightness of providing people with healthcare services, in some circumstances without their consent
This case concerns the scope of the compulsory treatment provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983. I...
A number of states have adopted a preference for voluntary hospitalization over involuntary civil co...
This article examines the impact of the New York court decision, Rivers v. Katz, which in June 1986 ...
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation re...
Przesłanki przymusowego przyjęcia do szpitala psychiatrycznego na podstawie art. 29 ustawy o ochroni...
The author discusses the court decisions re-volving around the right to treatment that have culminat...
The last two decades have witnessed numerous legal actions aimed at securing the rights of the menta...
This article examines several Supreme Court decisions and surveys recent literature and caselaw to a...
Commitment to outpatient psychiatric treatment evolved in the courts to protect patients ' righ...
When a dangerously mentally ill person is in need of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization, the app...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for compulsory admission to hospital, under criteria designed to...
This Note will first analyze and evaluate two competing decision-making models established in other ...
The translated thesis deals with the topic of admission to psychiatry departments without the patien...
Background: On the eve of reform of the 1983 Mental Health Act (MHA), little is known about how deci...
This article was a commentary on the judgments of the Regional Court and Court of Appeal, issued in ...
This case concerns the scope of the compulsory treatment provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983. I...
A number of states have adopted a preference for voluntary hospitalization over involuntary civil co...
This article examines the impact of the New York court decision, Rivers v. Katz, which in June 1986 ...
This article is a commentary on the court decisions made in connection with the factual situation re...
Przesłanki przymusowego przyjęcia do szpitala psychiatrycznego na podstawie art. 29 ustawy o ochroni...
The author discusses the court decisions re-volving around the right to treatment that have culminat...
The last two decades have witnessed numerous legal actions aimed at securing the rights of the menta...
This article examines several Supreme Court decisions and surveys recent literature and caselaw to a...
Commitment to outpatient psychiatric treatment evolved in the courts to protect patients ' righ...
When a dangerously mentally ill person is in need of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization, the app...
The Mental Health Act 1983 provides for compulsory admission to hospital, under criteria designed to...
This Note will first analyze and evaluate two competing decision-making models established in other ...
The translated thesis deals with the topic of admission to psychiatry departments without the patien...
Background: On the eve of reform of the 1983 Mental Health Act (MHA), little is known about how deci...
This article was a commentary on the judgments of the Regional Court and Court of Appeal, issued in ...
This case concerns the scope of the compulsory treatment provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983. I...
A number of states have adopted a preference for voluntary hospitalization over involuntary civil co...
This article examines the impact of the New York court decision, Rivers v. Katz, which in June 1986 ...