The purpose of this comment is to highlight the new procedural and substantive rights that are now guaranteed to the person sought to be committed for mental illness. The writers seek to evaluate it against a background of social and medical desirability, as well as constitutional mandates. One should keep in mind that our current method of dealing with the mentally ill is by no means either universal or necessary. Other societies have used different methods; some have been less compassionate, while others have been more so. In order to attempt to place Ohio\u27s law in this broad perspective, the writers have drawn upon the writings of commentators as well as judicial opinions and statutory law from other jurisdictions
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The argument presented in this article is that a new role has been developing in law which can and s...
This article concentrates on one vital issue: to what extent are differences in treatment justified ...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
By enacting the Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, Pennsylvania responded to judicial recognition...
This article begins and ends with a call for more empirical research to understand the connection be...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
Our thoughts on the proposed Mental Health Act are a product of us working together for a considerab...
This note will evaluate the three chapters of the Michigan Code which present the most significant l...
IT WAS A COLD, SNOWY DAY toward the end of November, 1859. C. P. Wolcott, one of Akron\u27s prominen...
Ohio House Bill 299, known as Jason\u27s Law in memory of Officer Jason West, proposes involuntary o...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
Commitment to a mental institution by itself does not, in all states, suspend civil rights. The cour...
Let us start our discussion by indicating a frame of reference for the comments we wish to give abou...
Responses and comments on the Draft Mental Health Bill are provided by:The Law SocietyThe Royal Coll...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The argument presented in this article is that a new role has been developing in law which can and s...
This article concentrates on one vital issue: to what extent are differences in treatment justified ...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
By enacting the Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, Pennsylvania responded to judicial recognition...
This article begins and ends with a call for more empirical research to understand the connection be...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
Our thoughts on the proposed Mental Health Act are a product of us working together for a considerab...
This note will evaluate the three chapters of the Michigan Code which present the most significant l...
IT WAS A COLD, SNOWY DAY toward the end of November, 1859. C. P. Wolcott, one of Akron\u27s prominen...
Ohio House Bill 299, known as Jason\u27s Law in memory of Officer Jason West, proposes involuntary o...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
Commitment to a mental institution by itself does not, in all states, suspend civil rights. The cour...
Let us start our discussion by indicating a frame of reference for the comments we wish to give abou...
Responses and comments on the Draft Mental Health Bill are provided by:The Law SocietyThe Royal Coll...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The argument presented in this article is that a new role has been developing in law which can and s...
This article concentrates on one vital issue: to what extent are differences in treatment justified ...