Add to ORKGBoth the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used in both countries. So, why is there such a large difference in the number of products liability suits filed? The present work explores the differences in the American and Japanese legal systems with a focus on products liability claims. The conclusion will show that it is the difference in the two countries applicable civil procedures that explain the disparity in suits
This article will explore how patent litigation in Japan has changed and will also compare and contr...
This translation of an original Japanese language work by Michida Shinichirō contrasts the differenc...
The authors suggest that Japan is a non-litigious society because of high litigation costs and lengt...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
The authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. Af...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
Trade between the United States and Japan is growing at such a rapid pace that it is incumbent on th...
Because of the relative paucity of international securities litigation in Japan, it is difficult to ...
Japanese jurisprudence has been strongly influenced by German jurisprudence, but this trend is chang...
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing t...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
This article will explore how patent litigation in Japan has changed and will also compare and contr...
This translation of an original Japanese language work by Michida Shinichirō contrasts the differenc...
The authors suggest that Japan is a non-litigious society because of high litigation costs and lengt...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
The authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. Af...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
Trade between the United States and Japan is growing at such a rapid pace that it is incumbent on th...
Because of the relative paucity of international securities litigation in Japan, it is difficult to ...
Japanese jurisprudence has been strongly influenced by German jurisprudence, but this trend is chang...
This article considers some of the current tactical and legal issues counsel must face in bringing t...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
This article will explore how patent litigation in Japan has changed and will also compare and contr...
This translation of an original Japanese language work by Michida Shinichirō contrasts the differenc...
The authors suggest that Japan is a non-litigious society because of high litigation costs and lengt...