Add to ORKGThe authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. After examining the historical backdrop of the consumer\u27s social role in both the United States and Japan, the authors argue that the new law cannot create a strict liability system like that of the United States in Japan, because the unique Japanese cultural context and its manipulation discourage the use of the legal process to advance consumer interests
This Article applies Japanese market behavior to Richard Epstein\u27s theories in his book Forbidden...
The purpose of this Article is to present a Japanese view of United States trade laws, concentrating...
This Article argues that the interaction of international norms and local culture is a central facto...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
Japan occupies a vantage point to observe the intersecting theories of fiduciary law and transnation...
This paper examines why Americans so often feel compelled to describe the Japanese in such strong te...
In this Essay I examine Haley’s claim that we see more regulatory continuity than change in Japan, t...
In this short Essay, I take stock of the recent hostile takeover developments in Japan with an eye t...
Trade between the United States and Japan is growing at such a rapid pace that it is incumbent on th...
This Article applies Japanese market behavior to Richard Epstein\u27s theories in his book Forbidden...
The purpose of this Article is to present a Japanese view of United States trade laws, concentrating...
This Article argues that the interaction of international norms and local culture is a central facto...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
Japan occupies a vantage point to observe the intersecting theories of fiduciary law and transnation...
This paper examines why Americans so often feel compelled to describe the Japanese in such strong te...
In this Essay I examine Haley’s claim that we see more regulatory continuity than change in Japan, t...
In this short Essay, I take stock of the recent hostile takeover developments in Japan with an eye t...
Trade between the United States and Japan is growing at such a rapid pace that it is incumbent on th...
This Article applies Japanese market behavior to Richard Epstein\u27s theories in his book Forbidden...
The purpose of this Article is to present a Japanese view of United States trade laws, concentrating...
This Article argues that the interaction of international norms and local culture is a central facto...