Add to ORKGBoth the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used in both countries. So, why is there such a large difference in the number of products liability suits filed? The present work explores the differences in the American and Japanese legal systems with a focus on products liability claims. The conclusion will show that it is the difference in the two countries applicable civil procedures that explain the disparity in suits
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
The concepts of trademark jurisprudence in Japan and the United States differ drastically. This diff...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
1.Introduction, 2,Strict Liability Legislation in Japan, Europe and Australia, 2.1.Purpose, 2.3.Defi...
Where products develop ever more rapidly, the law may face difficulties in responding accordingly to...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
With the increase of foreign trade, there has also been an increase in the number of foreign manufac...
This article will set forth and compare the domestic law of the United States and Japan, in the narr...
The authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. Af...
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
The concepts of trademark jurisprudence in Japan and the United States differ drastically. This diff...
Both the U.S. and Japan are highly industrialized countries and many of the same products are used i...
A new Product Liability (PL) Act in Japan became effective in July, 1995. In the United States, cong...
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan developed their product liability laws based on a c...
Consumers in wealthy countries like the U.S. and Japan usually know what they want, and how to obtai...
1.Introduction, 2,Strict Liability Legislation in Japan, Europe and Australia, 2.1.Purpose, 2.3.Defi...
Where products develop ever more rapidly, the law may face difficulties in responding accordingly to...
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product liability system since 1972. After much...
This note argues that Japan’s former product liability system deprived consumers of adequate protect...
The statutory language of Japan\u27s 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a strict liability regime...
With the increase of foreign trade, there has also been an increase in the number of foreign manufac...
This article will set forth and compare the domestic law of the United States and Japan, in the narr...
The authors analyze the 1994 Japanese products liability law from a national-culture perspective. Af...
Among industrialized nations, the United States is unique in addressing tort law at the state rather...
Products liability and comparative negligence are two very rapidly developing fields of tort law. In...
The concepts of trademark jurisprudence in Japan and the United States differ drastically. This diff...