Our motivational survey highlighted that easily available support would be a motivator for depositors to contribute their teaching materials into a repository. Support with rights issues is particularly important because of the confusion over rights that exists within UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). We have identified possible support that depositors and end users could receive. Some potential evaluation criteria have been identified to assess the licences that we have put in place. We aim to evaluate the experience of the depositor and the end user and assess each licence in terms of suitability and accuracy
Launched in 2021 by cOAlition S (an international consortium of research funders) the Rights Retenti...
We are a group of academics active in research and practice around data rights. We believe that the ...
This rights assessment evaluates the feasibility of converting the contents of WGBH's free online ed...
The Rights and Rewards in Blended Institutional Repositories project is funded by the Joint Informat...
In the United Kingdom over the past few years there has been a dramatic growth of national and regio...
As part of the JISC funded Rights and Rewards in Blended Institutional Repositories project, a motiv...
On Thursday 2nd November, the University of Glasgow Research Information Management Services Team, J...
This paper compares two JISC-funded surveys. The first was undertaken by the Rights MEtadata for Ope...
Purpose: Considers how the open access policy environment has developed since the RoMEO (Rights Meta...
Is the curriculum in British universities being influenced by decisions about ownership of intellect...
This report outlines the factors taken into consideration when designing a scheme to reward and supp...
This article argues that, as tutors, we are bound not only by the rules of contract law (i.e. to avo...
This paper is the fifth in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Righ...
Investigates whether and how UK university copyright policies address key copyright ownership issues...
As many librarians who work with digital collections know, ambiguous or meaningless rights statement...
Launched in 2021 by cOAlition S (an international consortium of research funders) the Rights Retenti...
We are a group of academics active in research and practice around data rights. We believe that the ...
This rights assessment evaluates the feasibility of converting the contents of WGBH's free online ed...
The Rights and Rewards in Blended Institutional Repositories project is funded by the Joint Informat...
In the United Kingdom over the past few years there has been a dramatic growth of national and regio...
As part of the JISC funded Rights and Rewards in Blended Institutional Repositories project, a motiv...
On Thursday 2nd November, the University of Glasgow Research Information Management Services Team, J...
This paper compares two JISC-funded surveys. The first was undertaken by the Rights MEtadata for Ope...
Purpose: Considers how the open access policy environment has developed since the RoMEO (Rights Meta...
Is the curriculum in British universities being influenced by decisions about ownership of intellect...
This report outlines the factors taken into consideration when designing a scheme to reward and supp...
This article argues that, as tutors, we are bound not only by the rules of contract law (i.e. to avo...
This paper is the fifth in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Righ...
Investigates whether and how UK university copyright policies address key copyright ownership issues...
As many librarians who work with digital collections know, ambiguous or meaningless rights statement...
Launched in 2021 by cOAlition S (an international consortium of research funders) the Rights Retenti...
We are a group of academics active in research and practice around data rights. We believe that the ...
This rights assessment evaluates the feasibility of converting the contents of WGBH's free online ed...