Add to ORKGFifty years ago, when Title VII was passed, no one thought that sexual orientation discrimination was unlawful sex discrimination. The Seventh Circuit’s decision to re-interpret Title VII challenges traditional approaches to statutory interpretation that should put Seventh Circuit litigants on notice of future uncertainty
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
In Bostock v. Clayton County the Supreme Court held that the Title VII ban on employment discriminat...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Baldwin v. Foxx opined—for the first time—that employ...
Fifty years ago, when Title VII was passed, no one thought that sexual orientation discrimination wa...
Since 2006, the Illinois Human Rights Act has prohibited discrimination in employment because of an ...
The Seventh Circuit’s en banc decision in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College has received as much ...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
In 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
More than thirty years ago, LGBT employees acrossthe United States sought relief from discrimination...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
In this article, Kenny Bohannon discusses whether the Eighth Circuit in the case of Horton v. Midwes...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
In Bostock v. Clayton County the Supreme Court held that the Title VII ban on employment discriminat...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Baldwin v. Foxx opined—for the first time—that employ...
Fifty years ago, when Title VII was passed, no one thought that sexual orientation discrimination wa...
Since 2006, the Illinois Human Rights Act has prohibited discrimination in employment because of an ...
The Seventh Circuit’s en banc decision in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College has received as much ...
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is d...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits employment discrimination on the basis...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
In 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community...
Under current federal law, a majority of jurisdictions decline to extend Title VII protections based...
As discussed herein, courts and individual judges recognizing or not finding actionable Title VII an...
More than thirty years ago, LGBT employees acrossthe United States sought relief from discrimination...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
In this article, Kenny Bohannon discusses whether the Eighth Circuit in the case of Horton v. Midwes...
Until relatively recently federal courts have held that claims of discrimination based in sexual ori...
In Bostock v. Clayton County the Supreme Court held that the Title VII ban on employment discriminat...
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in Baldwin v. Foxx opined—for the first time—that employ...