Unless restricted to explicitly held, sharable beliefs that control and justify a person’s behavior, the notion of a rule has little value as an explanatory concept. Similarity-based processing is a general characteristic of the mind-world interface where internal processes (including explicitly represented rules) act on the external world. The distinction between rules and similarity is therefore misconceived
This study investigates similarity judgments from two angles. First, we look at models suggested in ...
In the first chapters, the prevalent conception of the nature of similarity is shown to be too narro...
Kitcher (1996) offers a critique of connectionism based on the belief that connectionist information...
Abstract: Rules and similarity refer to qualitatively different processes. The classification of a s...
The key weakness of the proposed distinction between rules and similarity is that it effectively con...
The distinction between rule-based and similarity-based processes in cognition is of fundamental imp...
The distinction between rule-based and similarity-based processes in cognition is of fundamental imp...
Evidence from aphasia is considered that leads to a distinction between abstract and concrete though...
Similarity-based and rule-based accounts of cognition are often portrayed as opposing accounts. In ...
A central controversy in cognitive science concerns the roles of rules versus similarity. To gain so...
Dissociations between similarity and categorization have constituted critical counter-evidence to th...
For psychologists, the problem of induction has to do with distinguishing between generalizations pe...
Case-based Reasoning (CBR) began as a theory of human cognition, but has attracted relatively little...
Case-based Reasoning (CBR) began as a theory of human cognition, but has attracted relatively little...
A number of theoretical positions in psychology--including variants of case-based reasoning, instanc...
This study investigates similarity judgments from two angles. First, we look at models suggested in ...
In the first chapters, the prevalent conception of the nature of similarity is shown to be too narro...
Kitcher (1996) offers a critique of connectionism based on the belief that connectionist information...
Abstract: Rules and similarity refer to qualitatively different processes. The classification of a s...
The key weakness of the proposed distinction between rules and similarity is that it effectively con...
The distinction between rule-based and similarity-based processes in cognition is of fundamental imp...
The distinction between rule-based and similarity-based processes in cognition is of fundamental imp...
Evidence from aphasia is considered that leads to a distinction between abstract and concrete though...
Similarity-based and rule-based accounts of cognition are often portrayed as opposing accounts. In ...
A central controversy in cognitive science concerns the roles of rules versus similarity. To gain so...
Dissociations between similarity and categorization have constituted critical counter-evidence to th...
For psychologists, the problem of induction has to do with distinguishing between generalizations pe...
Case-based Reasoning (CBR) began as a theory of human cognition, but has attracted relatively little...
Case-based Reasoning (CBR) began as a theory of human cognition, but has attracted relatively little...
A number of theoretical positions in psychology--including variants of case-based reasoning, instanc...
This study investigates similarity judgments from two angles. First, we look at models suggested in ...
In the first chapters, the prevalent conception of the nature of similarity is shown to be too narro...
Kitcher (1996) offers a critique of connectionism based on the belief that connectionist information...