Enactment of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, with a provision for the awarding of attorneys\u27 fees, opened new opportunities for attorneys in private practice to represent victims of employment discrimination. Within recent years the Act has been predominate in litigation involving racial discriminaton in employment, but imaginative attorneys appealing to innovative courts have used other statutory and common law sources for fashioning relief. The 1866 Civil Rights Act, by analogy to its recent application to discriminatory housing practices, offers an important remedy against racial discrimination to employees. It also promises a protection, not found in Title VII, to employers who are willing to eradicate racial discriminatio...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Eradicating discrimination is a lofty goal, ard since the second half of the twentieth century, the ...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Congress intended that employees vindicate the rights given them under Title VII of the Civil Rights...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Professor Beaird believes that the current multiplicity of forums available to an employee who alleg...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
Report of the 1969 Proceedings of the Section of Labor Relations Law, American Bar Association
The 1964 Civil Rights Act, enacted on July 2nd of that year, represented an attempt by the federal g...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
Professor Brodin explores the clash between the antidiscrimination principle embodied in Title VII o...
This paper will argue that the changes wrought by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 do not in fact pose a...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Eradicating discrimination is a lofty goal, ard since the second half of the twentieth century, the ...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...
Congress intended that employees vindicate the rights given them under Title VII of the Civil Rights...
For many years the brunt of racial discrimination was sorely felt in the area of employment. Today, ...
The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that an action seeking relief from racial discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grants the federal courts jurisdiction in employment discr...
With the maturing of employment law and litigation, the shift away from class action to individual l...
Professor Beaird believes that the current multiplicity of forums available to an employee who alleg...
The United States Supreme Court has held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars racial ...
Report of the 1969 Proceedings of the Section of Labor Relations Law, American Bar Association
The 1964 Civil Rights Act, enacted on July 2nd of that year, represented an attempt by the federal g...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a broad remedial measure designed \u27to assure equali...
Professor Brodin explores the clash between the antidiscrimination principle embodied in Title VII o...
This paper will argue that the changes wrought by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 do not in fact pose a...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 sets forth certain broad prohibitions of discrimination ag...
Eradicating discrimination is a lofty goal, ard since the second half of the twentieth century, the ...
Hollander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 392 F. Supp. 90 (D. Conn. 1975). As the federal judiciary continu...