This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979) two–step estimator for estimating a selection model. It shows that exploratory work to check for collinearity problems is strongly recommended before deciding on which estimator to apply. In the absence of collinearity problems, the full–information maximum likelihood estimator is preferable to the limited–information two–step method of Heckman, although the latter also gives reasonable results. If, however, collinearity problems prevail, subsample OLS (or the Two–Part Model) is the most robust amongst the simple–to–calculate estimators
This paper has two goals. One is to examine the existing statistical techniques to correct for the s...
The classical Heckman (1976, 1979) selection correction estimator (heckit) is misspecified and inco...
This paper describes the implementation of Heckman-type sample selection models in R. We discuss the...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman?s (1976, 1979)...
This analysis shows that multivariate generalizations to the classical Heckman (1976 and 1979) two-s...
265 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.Statistical adjustments of co...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
This article constructs and evaluates Lagrange multiplier (LM) and Neyman's C(α) tests based on biva...
International audienceThis survey presents the set of methods available in the literature on selecti...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
The problem of non-random sample selectivity often occurs in practice in many fields. The classical ...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
Heien and Wessells' two-step estimator for the multivariate sample-selection model has been used ext...
Non‐random sampling is a source of bias in empirical research. It is common for the outcomes of inte...
This paper has two goals. One is to examine the existing statistical techniques to correct for the s...
The classical Heckman (1976, 1979) selection correction estimator (heckit) is misspecified and inco...
This paper describes the implementation of Heckman-type sample selection models in R. We discuss the...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman?s (1976, 1979)...
This analysis shows that multivariate generalizations to the classical Heckman (1976 and 1979) two-s...
265 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.Statistical adjustments of co...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
This article constructs and evaluates Lagrange multiplier (LM) and Neyman's C(α) tests based on biva...
International audienceThis survey presents the set of methods available in the literature on selecti...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
The problem of non-random sample selectivity often occurs in practice in many fields. The classical ...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
Heien and Wessells' two-step estimator for the multivariate sample-selection model has been used ext...
Non‐random sampling is a source of bias in empirical research. It is common for the outcomes of inte...
This paper has two goals. One is to examine the existing statistical techniques to correct for the s...
The classical Heckman (1976, 1979) selection correction estimator (heckit) is misspecified and inco...
This paper describes the implementation of Heckman-type sample selection models in R. We discuss the...