The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention both theoretically and empirically. However, very few is known about the finite sample behavior of two step estimators. In this paper we investigate by simulations both bias and finite sample distribution of these estimators when ignoring heteroskedasticity in the sample selection mechanism. It turns out that under conditions traditionally faced by practitioners, the misspecified parametric two step estimator (Heckman, 1979) performs better, in finite sample sizes, than the robust semiparametric one (Ahn and Powell, 1993). Moreover, under very general conditions, we show that the asymptotic bias of the parametric two step estimator is linear i...
Selectivity models usually consist of two equations: a linear and a qualitative variables equation. ...
Sample selection models attempt to correct for non-randomly selected data in a two-model hierarchy w...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
The problem of non-random sample selectivity often occurs in practice in many fields. The classical ...
Heien and Wessells' two-step estimator for the multivariate sample-selection model has been used ext...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
In this thesis estimators for "fixed-effects" panel data sample selection models are discussed, most...
A semiparametric two stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample selection mod...
This paper proposes a specification of Wooldridge's (1995) two step estimation method in which ...
We show with a simulation that nonrepresentative sampling of two discrete fitness classes leads to b...
A semiparametric two-stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample selection mode...
A semiparametric two stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample se-lection mod...
This paper considers the semiparametric estimation of binary choice sample selection models under a ...
It is shown how the usnal two-step estimator for the standard sample selection model can be seen as ...
Selectivity models usually consist of two equations: a linear and a qualitative variables equation. ...
Sample selection models attempt to correct for non-randomly selected data in a two-model hierarchy w...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
The problem of non-random sample selectivity often occurs in practice in many fields. The classical ...
Heien and Wessells' two-step estimator for the multivariate sample-selection model has been used ext...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
In this thesis estimators for "fixed-effects" panel data sample selection models are discussed, most...
A semiparametric two stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample selection mod...
This paper proposes a specification of Wooldridge's (1995) two step estimation method in which ...
We show with a simulation that nonrepresentative sampling of two discrete fitness classes leads to b...
A semiparametric two-stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample selection mode...
A semiparametric two stage estimation method is proposed for the estimation of sample se-lection mod...
This paper considers the semiparametric estimation of binary choice sample selection models under a ...
It is shown how the usnal two-step estimator for the standard sample selection model can be seen as ...
Selectivity models usually consist of two equations: a linear and a qualitative variables equation. ...
Sample selection models attempt to correct for non-randomly selected data in a two-model hierarchy w...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...