This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979) two–step estimator for estimating a selection model. It shows that exploratory work to check for collinearity problems is strongly recommended before deciding on which estimator to apply. In the absence of collinearity problems, the full–information maximum likelihood estimator is preferable to the limited–information two–step method of Heckman, although the latter also gives reasonable results. If, however, collinearity problems prevail, subsample OLS (or the Two–Part Model) is the most robust amongst the simple–to–calculate estimators
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
International audienceThis survey presents the set of methods available in the literature on selecti...
We consider two recent suggestions for how to perform an empirically motivated Monte Carlo study to ...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman?s (1976, 1979)...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
This analysis shows that multivariate generalizations to the classical Heckman (1976 and 1979) two-s...
The classical Heckman (1976, 1979) selection correction estimator (heckit) is misspecified and inco...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
Sample selection arises when the outcome of interest is partially observed in a study. A common cha...
This paper describes the implementation of Heckman-type sample selection models in R. We discuss the...
In low-income settings, key outcomes such as biomarkers or clinical assessments are often missing fo...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
265 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.Statistical adjustments of co...
Non‐random sampling is a source of bias in empirical research. It is common for the outcomes of inte...
This article constructs and evaluates Lagrange multiplier (LM) and Neyman's C(α) tests based on biva...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
International audienceThis survey presents the set of methods available in the literature on selecti...
We consider two recent suggestions for how to perform an empirically motivated Monte Carlo study to ...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman?s (1976, 1979)...
This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman's (1976, 1979)...
This analysis shows that multivariate generalizations to the classical Heckman (1976 and 1979) two-s...
The classical Heckman (1976, 1979) selection correction estimator (heckit) is misspecified and inco...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
Sample selection arises when the outcome of interest is partially observed in a study. A common cha...
This paper describes the implementation of Heckman-type sample selection models in R. We discuss the...
In low-income settings, key outcomes such as biomarkers or clinical assessments are often missing fo...
In this paper we discuss the differences between the average marginal effect and the marginal effect...
265 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.Statistical adjustments of co...
Non‐random sampling is a source of bias in empirical research. It is common for the outcomes of inte...
This article constructs and evaluates Lagrange multiplier (LM) and Neyman's C(α) tests based on biva...
The problem of specification errors in sample selection models has received considerable attention b...
International audienceThis survey presents the set of methods available in the literature on selecti...
We consider two recent suggestions for how to perform an empirically motivated Monte Carlo study to ...