The publication/citation debate inflamed by the Eighth Circuit decision has uncertain long-term implications. Among these impacts is the understanding of the parameters afforded federal courts by Article III of the United States Constitution. A number of other significant questions are raised, as well as including the access to and the reliance on the work product of the appellate courts
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
In Part I of this essay, I briefly consider the historical arguments for and against the appellate ...
Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has...
The publication/citation debate inflamed by the Eighth Circuit decision has uncertain long-term impl...
Last year\u27s Eighth Circuit decision of Anastasoff v. United States drew new attention to the much...
A recent decision by a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit enlivened the controvers...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
Unpublished appellate judicial opinions present formidable challenges for modern legal researchers, ...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
About 80% of federal appellate decisions are non-precedential. This Article examines the practical c...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
The basis for these comments is a decision last year by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anast...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
In Part I of this essay, I briefly consider the historical arguments for and against the appellate ...
Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has...
The publication/citation debate inflamed by the Eighth Circuit decision has uncertain long-term impl...
Last year\u27s Eighth Circuit decision of Anastasoff v. United States drew new attention to the much...
A recent decision by a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit enlivened the controvers...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
Many appellate court opinions are unpublished and have no precedential value. Publication standards ...
Unpublished appellate judicial opinions present formidable challenges for modern legal researchers, ...
Professor Dragich examines the no-citation rules of the federal courts of appeals in light of the pu...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
About 80% of federal appellate decisions are non-precedential. This Article examines the practical c...
In response to the crisis of volume, state and federal appellate courts have been restricting the ...
The federal courts of appeals have used unpublished opinions for thirty years as one method of cop...
The basis for these comments is a decision last year by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Anast...
This Comment is divided into seven parts. Part I provides an overview of the current practice concer...
In Part I of this essay, I briefly consider the historical arguments for and against the appellate ...
Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has...