Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has a practice of issuing one sentence orders in some cases. This practice benefits veterans by allowing decisions adverse to veterans to be made without creating precedential value. Removing the practice of unpublished opinions in the Federal Circuit would extinguish this benefit
Two-thirds of judges appointed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ( CAVC or Court ) could...
I have been asked to talk to you about the United States Court of Veterans Appeals-specifically, cha...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has...
Nearly twenty years ago, Congress for the first time created a system for judicial review of decisio...
The Supreme Court rarely grants certiorari in a veterans benefits case. Congress gave the Federal Ci...
The last in-depth review of veterans law cases decided by the Federal Circuit was published by the A...
The publication/citation debate inflamed by the Eighth Circuit decision has uncertain long-term impl...
The last in-depth review of veterans law cases decided by the Federal Circuit was published by the A...
Federal law has long deprived American veterans of certain fundamental legal rights enjoyed by non-v...
The Federal Circuit is the highest court to which veterans can appeal by right for benefits. In 2009...
I have been asked to give you the “veterans\u27 perspective” on whether the Court of Veterans Appeal...
In a March 1992 statement submitted to the Congress, the Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs descri...
Last year\u27s Eighth Circuit decision of Anastasoff v. United States drew new attention to the much...
An action was brought by the United States to recover sums of money paid to a veteran as an employme...
Two-thirds of judges appointed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ( CAVC or Court ) could...
I have been asked to talk to you about the United States Court of Veterans Appeals-specifically, cha...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...
Many cases regarding veterans\u27 benefits are heard in the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit has...
Nearly twenty years ago, Congress for the first time created a system for judicial review of decisio...
The Supreme Court rarely grants certiorari in a veterans benefits case. Congress gave the Federal Ci...
The last in-depth review of veterans law cases decided by the Federal Circuit was published by the A...
The publication/citation debate inflamed by the Eighth Circuit decision has uncertain long-term impl...
The last in-depth review of veterans law cases decided by the Federal Circuit was published by the A...
Federal law has long deprived American veterans of certain fundamental legal rights enjoyed by non-v...
The Federal Circuit is the highest court to which veterans can appeal by right for benefits. In 2009...
I have been asked to give you the “veterans\u27 perspective” on whether the Court of Veterans Appeal...
In a March 1992 statement submitted to the Congress, the Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs descri...
Last year\u27s Eighth Circuit decision of Anastasoff v. United States drew new attention to the much...
An action was brought by the United States to recover sums of money paid to a veteran as an employme...
Two-thirds of judges appointed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims ( CAVC or Court ) could...
I have been asked to talk to you about the United States Court of Veterans Appeals-specifically, cha...
In the wake of the publication of Anastasoff v. United States a new round of debate has begun over t...