Paul\u27s letters have a reading history of almost two millennia. It is a history of readings and misreadings, of grasping the general drift of the texts and of being puzzled when it comes down to the details. Readers have felt this ever since the New Testament era. Already in the first century Saint Peter writes that some things in Paul’s letters are hard to understand (2 Pet. 3:16)
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
The mysteries surrounding the apocryphal letter called Third Corinthians are enough to challenge the...
Paul\u27s letters have a reading history of almost two millennia. It is a history of readings and mi...
This article pursues an alternative approach to situating the historical circumstances and rhetorica...
The textual problems of the Pauline epistles have rarely received systematic study since the work of...
To read 2 Corinthians is to watch a pastor at work. Paul practices, describes, defends, and commends...
To read 2 Corinthians is to watch a pastor at work. Paul practices, describes, defends, and commends...
Brondos, David A. Paul on the Cross: Reconstructing the ApostleÕs Story of Redemption. Grand Rapids:...
Beyond conflict resolution lies a whole new way of defining reality, not by might or by power, or ev...
An exegetical and doctrinal study of 2 Corinthians, in particular those passages that serve to revea...
For two-hundred years now the integrity of Paul\u27s Second Letter to the Corinthians has been a mat...
Second Corinthians 5:16–6:2 rests within one of the most magisterial and problematic sections in Pau...
The contention of this thesis, then, is: The Apostle Paul\u27s apparent use of ancient Greco-Roman r...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
The mysteries surrounding the apocryphal letter called Third Corinthians are enough to challenge the...
Paul\u27s letters have a reading history of almost two millennia. It is a history of readings and mi...
This article pursues an alternative approach to situating the historical circumstances and rhetorica...
The textual problems of the Pauline epistles have rarely received systematic study since the work of...
To read 2 Corinthians is to watch a pastor at work. Paul practices, describes, defends, and commends...
To read 2 Corinthians is to watch a pastor at work. Paul practices, describes, defends, and commends...
Brondos, David A. Paul on the Cross: Reconstructing the ApostleÕs Story of Redemption. Grand Rapids:...
Beyond conflict resolution lies a whole new way of defining reality, not by might or by power, or ev...
An exegetical and doctrinal study of 2 Corinthians, in particular those passages that serve to revea...
For two-hundred years now the integrity of Paul\u27s Second Letter to the Corinthians has been a mat...
Second Corinthians 5:16–6:2 rests within one of the most magisterial and problematic sections in Pau...
The contention of this thesis, then, is: The Apostle Paul\u27s apparent use of ancient Greco-Roman r...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
At the presentation on 1 Corinthians, I wondered why the Apostle Paul had written this piece that di...
The mysteries surrounding the apocryphal letter called Third Corinthians are enough to challenge the...