Mr. Dhooge\u27s one-dimensional article is designed to make us believe that the Louisiana legislature was overpowered by politically powerful biblicists who want science fiction introduced into the public schools. It is remarkable that the legislative history is not cited by Dhooge except for those portions which are included in the Court\u27s distorted presentation of the record in Edwards v. Aguillard. Dhooge, echoing the Court, impugns the motives of Louisiana lawmakers who emphatically opposed improperly presented creation-science. It is difficult to credit Justice Brennan and Mr. Dhooge with a fair reading of the record when they cite snippets of testimony taken out of context. Indeed, it is intellectually irresponsible to suggest that...
(Excerpt) This Note asserts that the Louisiana Science Education Act is likely to be found unconstit...
The Scopes trial will never be the same. I mean the trial immortalized in Inherit the Wind,\u27 with...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Few issues have generated as much controversy as the scope of the religion clauses of the first amen...
The landmark Louisiana case Edwards v. Aguillard ushered in a new era of legislation in which certai...
In 1987, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the United States Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional. a Lo...
In the limited space available for response to Professor Leedes article, there is much which merits ...
This article examines the nature of scientific creationism and its educational value. Creation scien...
100/200-level Award Recipient for 2016. Paper written for course REL 204. Supporting faculty: Ed Sil...
The Arkansas Trial tested the legality of presenting both creation and evolution in public schools. ...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the articulated purpose in a state statute allowing fo...
This Article offers a spectator\u27s guide to this controversy by three central issues in Aguillard....
In a landmark decision, federal judge Overton struck down a creation science law in Arkansas. Judge ...
(Excerpt) This Note asserts that the Louisiana Science Education Act is likely to be found unconstit...
The Scopes trial will never be the same. I mean the trial immortalized in Inherit the Wind,\u27 with...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Few issues have generated as much controversy as the scope of the religion clauses of the first amen...
The landmark Louisiana case Edwards v. Aguillard ushered in a new era of legislation in which certai...
In 1987, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the United States Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional. a Lo...
In the limited space available for response to Professor Leedes article, there is much which merits ...
This article examines the nature of scientific creationism and its educational value. Creation scien...
100/200-level Award Recipient for 2016. Paper written for course REL 204. Supporting faculty: Ed Sil...
The Arkansas Trial tested the legality of presenting both creation and evolution in public schools. ...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the articulated purpose in a state statute allowing fo...
This Article offers a spectator\u27s guide to this controversy by three central issues in Aguillard....
In a landmark decision, federal judge Overton struck down a creation science law in Arkansas. Judge ...
(Excerpt) This Note asserts that the Louisiana Science Education Act is likely to be found unconstit...
The Scopes trial will never be the same. I mean the trial immortalized in Inherit the Wind,\u27 with...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...