Add to ORKG100/200-level Award Recipient for 2016. Paper written for course REL 204. Supporting faculty: Ed Silver
This Comment examines why a seemingly well-settled scientific issue, evolution through natural selec...
The landmark Louisiana case Edwards v. Aguillard ushered in a new era of legislation in which certai...
Over seventy-five years after the impassioned debate be- tween William Jennings Bryan and Clarence D...
Viewed some three decades later the constitutional problems posed bythe Scopes case appear in a some...
Few issues have generated as much controversy as the scope of the religion clauses of the first amen...
Religious arguments have permeated debates on the role of the law in medical practice at the beginni...
The academic study of the Scopes Trial has always been approached from a traditional legal interpret...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the anti-evolution la...
When Judge John E. Jones, III, a United States District Court judge appointed by President George W....
In 1925 John T. Scopes was convicted of the crime of teaching evolution in violation of a new Tennes...
Although many previous cases addressing this issue have gained national attention perhaps no other i...
The Arkansas Trial tested the legality of presenting both creation and evolution in public schools. ...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Mr. Dhooge\u27s one-dimensional article is designed to make us believe that the Louisiana legislatur...
This Comment examines why a seemingly well-settled scientific issue, evolution through natural selec...
The landmark Louisiana case Edwards v. Aguillard ushered in a new era of legislation in which certai...
Over seventy-five years after the impassioned debate be- tween William Jennings Bryan and Clarence D...
Viewed some three decades later the constitutional problems posed bythe Scopes case appear in a some...
Few issues have generated as much controversy as the scope of the religion clauses of the first amen...
Religious arguments have permeated debates on the role of the law in medical practice at the beginni...
The academic study of the Scopes Trial has always been approached from a traditional legal interpret...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the anti-evolution la...
When Judge John E. Jones, III, a United States District Court judge appointed by President George W....
In 1925 John T. Scopes was convicted of the crime of teaching evolution in violation of a new Tennes...
Although many previous cases addressing this issue have gained national attention perhaps no other i...
The Arkansas Trial tested the legality of presenting both creation and evolution in public schools. ...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Mr. Dhooge\u27s one-dimensional article is designed to make us believe that the Louisiana legislatur...
This Comment examines why a seemingly well-settled scientific issue, evolution through natural selec...
The landmark Louisiana case Edwards v. Aguillard ushered in a new era of legislation in which certai...
Over seventy-five years after the impassioned debate be- tween William Jennings Bryan and Clarence D...