In the limited space available for response to Professor Leedes article, there is much which merits further attention but which cannot escape the bonds of paginal constraint. With regard to these unaddressed disputes, the reader is directed to the discussions of the relative merits of the controversy contained within the articles. Given the broad differences in viewpoint between Professor Leedes and myself, it would be practically impossible to address all of our differences in this response for fear of the response devouring its parent article-in-chief. Bearing these limitations in mind, I tender my response to Professor Leedes\u27 article
This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s argument that Congress should repeal Title VII expresse...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...
In 1987, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the United States Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional. a Lo...
This article examines the nature of scientific creationism and its educational value. Creation scien...
Mr. Dhooge\u27s one-dimensional article is designed to make us believe that the Louisiana legislatur...
[Excerpt] When Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection in 1...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Thirty years of intensive efforts by creationists have produced little substantiate prog ress in bri...
The Constitution presupposes no Supreme Being, institutes no particular truth and contemplates a leg...
(Excerpt) This Note asserts that the Louisiana Science Education Act is likely to be found unconstit...
If America wants to stay at the forefront of scientific study and remain competitive with other nati...
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the anti-evolution la...
Many constitutional bases exist to support creationists\u27 right to disseminate creation science ev...
The playing field is far from level in the contest between Evolutionism and Scientific Creationism. ...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s argument that Congress should repeal Title VII expresse...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...
In 1987, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the United States Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional. a Lo...
This article examines the nature of scientific creationism and its educational value. Creation scien...
Mr. Dhooge\u27s one-dimensional article is designed to make us believe that the Louisiana legislatur...
[Excerpt] When Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection in 1...
This Note first discusses the legal background of the creation-science/evolution debate in cases pri...
Thirty years of intensive efforts by creationists have produced little substantiate prog ress in bri...
The Constitution presupposes no Supreme Being, institutes no particular truth and contemplates a leg...
(Excerpt) This Note asserts that the Louisiana Science Education Act is likely to be found unconstit...
If America wants to stay at the forefront of scientific study and remain competitive with other nati...
Since the infamous Scopes trial the matter of the constitutional validity of the anti-evolution la...
Many constitutional bases exist to support creationists\u27 right to disseminate creation science ev...
The playing field is far from level in the contest between Evolutionism and Scientific Creationism. ...
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conf...
This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s argument that Congress should repeal Title VII expresse...
The Genesis The “Exodus” Stage 1—Prohibition Stage 2—Equal Treatment … McLean v. Arkansas Board of...
In 1987, in Edwards v. Aguillard, the United States Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional. a Lo...