Add to ORKGIn this article, the author discusses philosophy teacher David Estlund\u27s belief that subjects of a state with a morally justified claim to political authority have a duty to obey its legal commands to wage a particular war, even if they believe that the state has made a mistake in its reasons for waging the war. The author argues that Estlund\u27s theory also allows for individuals to assess the justice of the wars they fight. He also argues that Estlund\u27s view also holds that individual combatants should not be held accountable for any injustice of a war that the state believes is morally permissible to fight
In this brief comment, I want to argue, without making any definite judgments about the current situ...
Different societies came to consider certain behaviors as morally wrong, and, in time, due to a more...
M.A. (Philosophy)Abstract: Just War Theory (JWT) helps theorists and politicians assess how just a w...
Abstract: One of the most influential and known view regarding the morality of war is the Just War T...
Just war theory is dominated by two positions. According to the traditional view, combatants both on...
Christopher J. Finlay claims “that a principle of moral or legitimate authority is necessary in just...
This article challenges the tendency exhibited in arguments by Michael Ignatieff, Jeremy Waldron, an...
Despite a recent explosion of interest in the ethics of armed conflict, the traditional just war cri...
This article assesses the recently renewed interest in the just war criterion of sovereign authority...
achievement of a just cause are morally impermissible and it is wrong to fight in a war that lacks a...
Law and Morality at War offers a broadly instrumentalist defense of the authority of the laws of war...
This article assesses whether the contemporary consensus of just war thinking to allow only for defe...
In this brief article, the author distinguishes between justifiable power-conferring rules and unjus...
Despite a recent explosion of interest in the ethics of armed conflict, the traditional just war cri...
Christopher J. Finlay claims “that a principle of moral or legitimate authority is necessary in just...
In this brief comment, I want to argue, without making any definite judgments about the current situ...
Different societies came to consider certain behaviors as morally wrong, and, in time, due to a more...
M.A. (Philosophy)Abstract: Just War Theory (JWT) helps theorists and politicians assess how just a w...
Abstract: One of the most influential and known view regarding the morality of war is the Just War T...
Just war theory is dominated by two positions. According to the traditional view, combatants both on...
Christopher J. Finlay claims “that a principle of moral or legitimate authority is necessary in just...
This article challenges the tendency exhibited in arguments by Michael Ignatieff, Jeremy Waldron, an...
Despite a recent explosion of interest in the ethics of armed conflict, the traditional just war cri...
This article assesses the recently renewed interest in the just war criterion of sovereign authority...
achievement of a just cause are morally impermissible and it is wrong to fight in a war that lacks a...
Law and Morality at War offers a broadly instrumentalist defense of the authority of the laws of war...
This article assesses whether the contemporary consensus of just war thinking to allow only for defe...
In this brief article, the author distinguishes between justifiable power-conferring rules and unjus...
Despite a recent explosion of interest in the ethics of armed conflict, the traditional just war cri...
Christopher J. Finlay claims “that a principle of moral or legitimate authority is necessary in just...
In this brief comment, I want to argue, without making any definite judgments about the current situ...
Different societies came to consider certain behaviors as morally wrong, and, in time, due to a more...
M.A. (Philosophy)Abstract: Just War Theory (JWT) helps theorists and politicians assess how just a w...