Add to ORKGIn this brief article, the author distinguishes between justifiable power-conferring rules and unjustifiable allegiance to an authority who holds a position. Rules are justified and can create justifiable positions of authority when the rules are exercised to promote its subject\u27s secular well being. The author argues that when rules are not justifiable, there is no obligation to comply with such laws
Numerous theories have been developed to explain the basis, beyond a legal one, upon which the citiz...
In his provocative, courageous, and original new book, Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of ...
The received view on the nature of legal authority contains the idea that a sound account of legitim...
The thesis of this article is that, for the Rule of Law to be maintained in a modern technological s...
(Excerpt) Throughout history, some have questioned whether the authority exercised by some over othe...
The central claim of Abner Greene’s Against Obligation appears to be that the federal government sho...
Journal ArticleIt is often said that we have an obligation to obey the law just because it is the la...
Written for a symposium in the University of San Diego Law School in September 2013 on Laurence Clau...
Legitimate political authority is often said to involve a “right to rule,” which is most plausibly u...
Two central issues in literature discussing legal authority seems to the the questions of what the l...
Much modern jurisprudence attempts to move the locus of authority away from people with authority in...
Three concepts – authority, obedience and obligation – are central to understanding law and politica...
The authors\u27 purpose in this important and intriguing book is to contribute to what they call th...
I recently published a long article\u27 discussing a variety of topics from Joseph Raz\u27s The Mora...
It is commonly supposed that citizens of a reasonably just state have a prima facie duty to obey its...
Numerous theories have been developed to explain the basis, beyond a legal one, upon which the citiz...
In his provocative, courageous, and original new book, Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of ...
The received view on the nature of legal authority contains the idea that a sound account of legitim...
The thesis of this article is that, for the Rule of Law to be maintained in a modern technological s...
(Excerpt) Throughout history, some have questioned whether the authority exercised by some over othe...
The central claim of Abner Greene’s Against Obligation appears to be that the federal government sho...
Journal ArticleIt is often said that we have an obligation to obey the law just because it is the la...
Written for a symposium in the University of San Diego Law School in September 2013 on Laurence Clau...
Legitimate political authority is often said to involve a “right to rule,” which is most plausibly u...
Two central issues in literature discussing legal authority seems to the the questions of what the l...
Much modern jurisprudence attempts to move the locus of authority away from people with authority in...
Three concepts – authority, obedience and obligation – are central to understanding law and politica...
The authors\u27 purpose in this important and intriguing book is to contribute to what they call th...
I recently published a long article\u27 discussing a variety of topics from Joseph Raz\u27s The Mora...
It is commonly supposed that citizens of a reasonably just state have a prima facie duty to obey its...
Numerous theories have been developed to explain the basis, beyond a legal one, upon which the citiz...
In his provocative, courageous, and original new book, Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of ...
The received view on the nature of legal authority contains the idea that a sound account of legitim...