When negotiations break down and a dispute cannot be settled, attorneys commonly blame their adversaries, often questioning their ethics or their judgment. After interviewing many attorneys, we have come to believe much of the criticism is directed at strategic moves in negotiation. But strategic ploys are not the only reason dispute resolution fails. Rather, our research also suggest that a genuine desire for vindication through trial or other formal process may be very significant in some types of cases where bargaining breaks down
Plea negotiations are frequently criticized on the basis that they may arise from deception, coercio...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
article published in law reviewLaw and economics models of litigation settlement, based on the behav...
When negotiations break down and a dispute cannot be settled, attorneys commonly blame their adversa...
The traditional economic model of settlement breakdown -- as developed by Priest and Klein -- provid...
Few of the suits that are filed continue to trial, but some plaintiffs and defendants find their int...
A trial is a failure. Although we celebrate it as the centerpiece of our system of justice, we know ...
As plea bargains have proliferated in the criminal justice system, scholars have been working to bet...
When two litigants resolve a dispute through out-of-court settlement rather than trial, they realize...
Plea bargaining happens in almost every criminal case, yet there is little empirical study about wha...
A persistently troubling question in the legal-economic literature is why cases proceed to trial. Li...
Following a larger previous study on the negotiation styles of lawyers, this article examines more s...
Litigation seems to be a Pareto-ineffcient outcome of pretrial bargaining; however, this paper shows...
The role of judges in processing criminal legal conflicts has changed dramatically in the past decad...
This article examines the repercussions of choosing a negotiating style for the present criminal cas...
Plea negotiations are frequently criticized on the basis that they may arise from deception, coercio...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
article published in law reviewLaw and economics models of litigation settlement, based on the behav...
When negotiations break down and a dispute cannot be settled, attorneys commonly blame their adversa...
The traditional economic model of settlement breakdown -- as developed by Priest and Klein -- provid...
Few of the suits that are filed continue to trial, but some plaintiffs and defendants find their int...
A trial is a failure. Although we celebrate it as the centerpiece of our system of justice, we know ...
As plea bargains have proliferated in the criminal justice system, scholars have been working to bet...
When two litigants resolve a dispute through out-of-court settlement rather than trial, they realize...
Plea bargaining happens in almost every criminal case, yet there is little empirical study about wha...
A persistently troubling question in the legal-economic literature is why cases proceed to trial. Li...
Following a larger previous study on the negotiation styles of lawyers, this article examines more s...
Litigation seems to be a Pareto-ineffcient outcome of pretrial bargaining; however, this paper shows...
The role of judges in processing criminal legal conflicts has changed dramatically in the past decad...
This article examines the repercussions of choosing a negotiating style for the present criminal cas...
Plea negotiations are frequently criticized on the basis that they may arise from deception, coercio...
Do lawyers facilitate dispute resolution or do they instead exacerbate conflict and pose a barrier t...
article published in law reviewLaw and economics models of litigation settlement, based on the behav...