Due to advances in climate science and an increased understanding of coal’s role as a greenhouse gas, Appellant conservation organizations sued the Secretary of Interior for failing to supplement the 1979 Programmatic EIS for the Federal Coal Management Program. The D.C. Circuit Court held neither NEPA nor the APA required a supplemental EIS and that the court lacked jurisdiction to compel the Secretary to prepare one. Expressing sympathy for the Appellants’ position, the D.C. Circuit took the unusual step of offering advice to future plaintiffs on how they might succeed on similar claims
Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits courts to hearing only cases and controversies. To addre...
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In 2017, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a new order lifting the previous administration...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
Holding that the widespread effects of environmental regulation on the coal industry constituted suf...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
In Wyoming v. Zinke, the Bureau of Land Management attempted to update a regulation governing hydrau...
In Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addre...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
The EPA created the Clean Power Plan in an effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions g...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits courts to hearing only cases and controversies. To addre...
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to ...
In 2017, Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a new order lifting the previous administration...
As part of a comprehensive strategy to keep coal “in the ground,” environmental plaintiffs challenge...
Holding that the widespread effects of environmental regulation on the coal industry constituted suf...
The United States District Court for the District of Montana granted Plaintiffs summary judgment aga...
To what extent must the BLM analyze potential climate change impacts where millions of acres of publ...
In Wyoming v. Zinke, the Bureau of Land Management attempted to update a regulation governing hydrau...
In Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addre...
In Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership v. Salazar, the United States District Court of Appea...
The EPA created the Clean Power Plan in an effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions g...
In Great Basin Resource Watch v. Bureau of Land Management, the Ninth Circuit invalidated the BLM’s ...
In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developm...
Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits courts to hearing only cases and controversies. To addre...
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...