Add to ORKGThe United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted a motion for summary vacatur against the Environmental Protection Agency after environmental groups challenged the agency’s reconsideration of the Obama-era methane rule under the Clean Air Act. The court held that the EPA unlawfully issued a stay after it reconsidered the rule without proper authorization. The court vacated the EPA’s stay, one example of the Trump Administration unsuccessfully repealing Obama-era rulemaking
Not long after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a case challeng...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
The EPA created the Clean Power Plan in an effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions g...
On February 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the landmark West Virginia v. ...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided cases in 2008 that addressed the...
In Massachusetts v. EPA, petitioners - twelve states, three cities, an American territory, and numer...
On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Clean Air Act against a constitutiona...
In 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided two cases concerning the...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
Under President Clinton the U.S. EPA took the position that it had the authority to regulate greenho...
The surprise in Massachusetts v. EPA was not that it was a close, hotly contested case. Rather, the ...
The purpose of this case note is to explore the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA....
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) is poised to become a prime ba...
Not long after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a case challeng...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
The EPA created the Clean Power Plan in an effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions g...
On February 28, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the landmark West Virginia v. ...
The U.S. Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency properly interpreted the “Good...
Congress amended the Clean Air Act in 1977 because of public concern that enforcement of the Clean A...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided cases in 2008 that addressed the...
In Massachusetts v. EPA, petitioners - twelve states, three cities, an American territory, and numer...
On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Clean Air Act against a constitutiona...
In 2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided two cases concerning the...
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy ...
Under President Clinton the U.S. EPA took the position that it had the authority to regulate greenho...
The surprise in Massachusetts v. EPA was not that it was a close, hotly contested case. Rather, the ...
The purpose of this case note is to explore the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA....
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) is poised to become a prime ba...
Not long after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a case challeng...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
The EPA created the Clean Power Plan in an effort to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions g...