A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all. Fortunately, you can reach a switch that will turn the trolley onto a side track – but then you notice that one other person is standing there. Is it morally permissible for you to turn the trolley to that side track, where it will kill one person instead of five? Is it not only morally permissible, but even morally required? This classic thought experiment is a mainstay in the repertoire of law school hypotheticals, often raised alongside cases about cannibalism at sea, tossing people from overcrowded lifeboats, or destroying buildings to save a city from fire
There is a long-standing debate in philosophy about whether it is morally permissible to harm one pe...
In this paper, I will argue that automated vehicles should not swerve to avoid a person or vehicle i...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...
A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all...
The main reason why virtue ethicists have avoided the Trolley Debate is that it is, in a sense, "no...
In two fascinating and provocative papers, Judith Jarvis Thomson discusses the Trolley Problem. In...
The trolley problem is a well-known thought experiment in moral philosophy, used to explore issues s...
A runaway trolley is approaching a fork in the tracks. If the trolley runs on its cur-rent track, it...
Many people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some circumstan...
Would you redirect a trolley to save five people even if it means that the trolley will run over a p...
In this essay I argue that traditional solutions to the trolley problem, named for a series of cases...
AbstractMany people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some ci...
This chapter proposes a solution to the Trolley Problem in terms of the Kantian prohibition on using...
The trolley problem, first described by Foot (1967) and Thomson (The Monist, 59, 204–217, 1976), is ...
(Excerpt) A steam train is chugging along down a country track. You are a passenger, watching red an...
There is a long-standing debate in philosophy about whether it is morally permissible to harm one pe...
In this paper, I will argue that automated vehicles should not swerve to avoid a person or vehicle i...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...
A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all...
The main reason why virtue ethicists have avoided the Trolley Debate is that it is, in a sense, "no...
In two fascinating and provocative papers, Judith Jarvis Thomson discusses the Trolley Problem. In...
The trolley problem is a well-known thought experiment in moral philosophy, used to explore issues s...
A runaway trolley is approaching a fork in the tracks. If the trolley runs on its cur-rent track, it...
Many people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some circumstan...
Would you redirect a trolley to save five people even if it means that the trolley will run over a p...
In this essay I argue that traditional solutions to the trolley problem, named for a series of cases...
AbstractMany people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some ci...
This chapter proposes a solution to the Trolley Problem in terms of the Kantian prohibition on using...
The trolley problem, first described by Foot (1967) and Thomson (The Monist, 59, 204–217, 1976), is ...
(Excerpt) A steam train is chugging along down a country track. You are a passenger, watching red an...
There is a long-standing debate in philosophy about whether it is morally permissible to harm one pe...
In this paper, I will argue that automated vehicles should not swerve to avoid a person or vehicle i...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...