A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all. Fortunately, you can reach a switch that will turn the trolley onto a side track – but then you notice that one other person is standing there. Is it morally permissible for you to turn the trolley to that side track, where it will kill one person instead of five? Is it not only morally permissible, but even morally required? This classic thought experiment is a mainstay in the repertoire of law school hypotheticals, often raised alongside cases about cannibalism at sea, tossing people from overcrowded lifeboats, or destroying buildings to save a city from fire
Color poster with text and graphs of research conducted by Jonathan Baker, Lyndsay Nelson, Kimberly ...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...
(Excerpt) A steam train is chugging along down a country track. You are a passenger, watching red an...
A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all...
Would you redirect a trolley to save five people even if it means that the trolley will run over a p...
The main reason why virtue ethicists have avoided the Trolley Debate is that it is, in a sense, "no...
A runaway trolley is approaching a fork in the tracks. If the trolley runs on its cur-rent track, it...
AbstractMany people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some ci...
The trolley problem, first described by Foot (1967) and Thomson (The Monist, 59, 204–217, 1976), is ...
There is a long-standing debate in philosophy about whether it is morally permissible to harm one pe...
Judith Jarvis Thomson has recently proposed a new argument for the thesis that killing the one in th...
In this book chapter I argue that, contrary to what is said by Paul Guyer in his book Kant (Routledg...
Many people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some circumstan...
Color poster with text and graphs of research conducted by Jonathan Baker, Lyndsay Nelson, Kimberly ...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...
(Excerpt) A steam train is chugging along down a country track. You are a passenger, watching red an...
A runaway trolley rushes toward five people standing on the tracks, and it will surely kill them all...
Would you redirect a trolley to save five people even if it means that the trolley will run over a p...
The main reason why virtue ethicists have avoided the Trolley Debate is that it is, in a sense, "no...
A runaway trolley is approaching a fork in the tracks. If the trolley runs on its cur-rent track, it...
AbstractMany people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some ci...
The trolley problem, first described by Foot (1967) and Thomson (The Monist, 59, 204–217, 1976), is ...
There is a long-standing debate in philosophy about whether it is morally permissible to harm one pe...
Judith Jarvis Thomson has recently proposed a new argument for the thesis that killing the one in th...
In this book chapter I argue that, contrary to what is said by Paul Guyer in his book Kant (Routledg...
Many people judge that it is permissible to harm one person in order to save many in some circumstan...
Color poster with text and graphs of research conducted by Jonathan Baker, Lyndsay Nelson, Kimberly ...
I analyse the relationship between the Doctrine of Double Effect and the Trolley Problem: the former...
(Excerpt) A steam train is chugging along down a country track. You are a passenger, watching red an...