Add to ORKGThe international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush Doctrine violates or creates international law. If the Bush Doctrine is understood to mean that only the United States may use force preemptively, then it is not creating law; it is merely a unilateral assertion of power. If, on the other hand, all states may use the Bush Doctrine to act to prevent war, then violence is maximized. In order for the Bush Doctrine to be accepted as law, there must be a limiting principle
This chapter concerns the central international legal rule against violence: Article 2(4) of the Uni...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
On November 13, 2001, President George W. Bush issued a Military Order in which he claimed power as ...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
This paper is a critique of the recent emphasis evident in US foreign policy towards the use of mili...
The Bush Doctrine, formally known as the United States National Security Strategy 2002, reorients Un...
In 2002, the United States asserted that, as part of its national security strategies, it was to inv...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
The attitude of past United States administrations to public international law, particularly but not...
The election of President Barack Obama has generated enormous goodwill abroad. Many have come to ant...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
The recent invasion of Iraq challenges a cornerstone of contemporary international law: the prohibit...
No aspect of the Bush Administration\u27s foreign policy has caused greater consternation in Europe,...
Historically, courts have recognized a customary international law only upon finding evidence of uni...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
This chapter concerns the central international legal rule against violence: Article 2(4) of the Uni...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
On November 13, 2001, President George W. Bush issued a Military Order in which he claimed power as ...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
This paper is a critique of the recent emphasis evident in US foreign policy towards the use of mili...
The Bush Doctrine, formally known as the United States National Security Strategy 2002, reorients Un...
In 2002, the United States asserted that, as part of its national security strategies, it was to inv...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
The attitude of past United States administrations to public international law, particularly but not...
The election of President Barack Obama has generated enormous goodwill abroad. Many have come to ant...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
The recent invasion of Iraq challenges a cornerstone of contemporary international law: the prohibit...
No aspect of the Bush Administration\u27s foreign policy has caused greater consternation in Europe,...
Historically, courts have recognized a customary international law only upon finding evidence of uni...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
This chapter concerns the central international legal rule against violence: Article 2(4) of the Uni...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
On November 13, 2001, President George W. Bush issued a Military Order in which he claimed power as ...