Add to ORKGThe thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by the United States against non-state actors and rogue states, appears to be justified under international law, such a military exercise must be subject to well defined and clearly stated international legal rules
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
The United States military strikes against Afghanistan cannot be justified as self-defense under the...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
This article analyzes the existing concepts of the right of self-defense and preemption under intern...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
On October 7,2001, the United States and the United Kingdom launched operation Enduring Freedom. End...
On October 7,2001, the United States and the United Kingdom launched operation Enduring Freedom. End...
The most publicized element of The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (the ...
On September 17, 2002, the National Security Strategy was published. This paper outlines the reach o...
International law has long held that the use of force between states is illegal. There are only two ...
This Article explores the appropriateness of preemptive strategies in international law. Are preempt...
No aspect of the Bush Administration\u27s foreign policy has caused greater consternation in Europe,...
This research is concern to one of United States policy relating to the right of selfdefense or well...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
The United States military strikes against Afghanistan cannot be justified as self-defense under the...
The thesis of this article argues that while the use of preemptive military strikes, now adopted by ...
This article analyzes the existing concepts of the right of self-defense and preemption under intern...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
On October 7,2001, the United States and the United Kingdom launched operation Enduring Freedom. End...
On October 7,2001, the United States and the United Kingdom launched operation Enduring Freedom. End...
The most publicized element of The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (the ...
On September 17, 2002, the National Security Strategy was published. This paper outlines the reach o...
International law has long held that the use of force between states is illegal. There are only two ...
This Article explores the appropriateness of preemptive strategies in international law. Are preempt...
No aspect of the Bush Administration\u27s foreign policy has caused greater consternation in Europe,...
This research is concern to one of United States policy relating to the right of selfdefense or well...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
To the extent that the intervention in Iraq in 2003 is regarded as an act of preemptive self-defense...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
The United States military strikes against Afghanistan cannot be justified as self-defense under the...