The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush Doctrine violates or creates international law. If the Bush Doctrine is understood to mean that only the United States may use force preemptively, then it is not creating law; it is merely a unilateral assertion of power. If, on the other hand, all states may use the Bush Doctrine to act to prevent war, then violence is maximized. In order for the Bush Doctrine to be accepted as law, there must be a limiting principle
There is a rich literature on the circumstances under which the United Nations Charter or specific S...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
Esta tese tem por objetivo criticar a \"Doutrina Bush\", cujos termos foram lançados na Estratégia d...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
The Bush Doctrine, formally known as the United States National Security Strategy 2002, reorients Un...
This paper is a critique of the recent emphasis evident in US foreign policy towards the use of mili...
The election of President Barack Obama has generated enormous goodwill abroad. Many have come to ant...
In 2002, the United States asserted that, as part of its national security strategies, it was to inv...
Historically, courts have recognized a customary international law only upon finding evidence of uni...
This article considers whether the Bush Doctrine seeks to establish a new rule for the preventitive ...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
Pre-emption and prevention: an ethical and legal critique of the Bush doctrine and anticipatory use ...
This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates t...
There is a rich literature on the circumstances under which the United Nations Charter or specific S...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
There is a rich literature on the circumstances under which the United Nations Charter or specific S...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
Esta tese tem por objetivo criticar a \"Doutrina Bush\", cujos termos foram lançados na Estratégia d...
The international legal system operates to minimize violence. This paper examines whether the Bush D...
The Bush Doctrine, formally known as the United States National Security Strategy 2002, reorients Un...
This paper is a critique of the recent emphasis evident in US foreign policy towards the use of mili...
The election of President Barack Obama has generated enormous goodwill abroad. Many have come to ant...
In 2002, the United States asserted that, as part of its national security strategies, it was to inv...
Historically, courts have recognized a customary international law only upon finding evidence of uni...
This article considers whether the Bush Doctrine seeks to establish a new rule for the preventitive ...
Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an a...
Pre-emption and prevention: an ethical and legal critique of the Bush doctrine and anticipatory use ...
This book examines US recourse to military force in the post-9/11 era. In particular, it evaluates t...
There is a rich literature on the circumstances under which the United Nations Charter or specific S...
The war on terrorism has dramatically impacted the direction of U.S. foreign policy, as well as the ...
There is a rich literature on the circumstances under which the United Nations Charter or specific S...
The question posed is the most important issue in world politics: under what circumstances may state...
Esta tese tem por objetivo criticar a \"Doutrina Bush\", cujos termos foram lançados na Estratégia d...